However, just as Huawei's 5G technology was boycotted by many western countries, it was reported that the three major domestic operators, China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom, successively signed orders of about 24 billion yuan with Nokia.
Once the news came out, it immediately caused an uproar. At this critical moment of the Sino-US trade war, it is really not feasible for even domestic operators to abandon Huawei and go to the United States. However, in my opinion, the three major operators choose Nokia because it can bring more benefits. After all, Nokia has always been the leader in the communications industry, and its technical strength is definitely going to pass.
In fact, as early as CCTV criticized operators for "making money for the sake of making money", many people were disappointed with the three major operators. The author uses a mobile phone number, and I can hardly understand the bills and packages over the past few years. What's obviously not opening the traffic? After it was used up, messages such as 10 yuan 1M emerged one after another. As one of the best state-owned enterprises, the three major operators have obviously failed to fulfill their due responsibilities.
However, we don't need to worry about it. The 5G network is a big system, and operators will certainly not be stupid enough to cooperate only with Nokia. Moreover, the state will certainly not ignore it. Does the core dare to support Huawei? The country will shut you down in minutes!
Where did this come from in Qualcomm? Although Qualcomm is very good at 5G, there is no specific production equipment. Where do suppliers come from? If it is about the test between the 5G chip and the RF module, it is very possible. Because regarding communications, at present, only Huawei, ZTE, Shinco, Nokia, Ericsson and other enterprises can accept 5G orders.
People still remember the choice of Nokia by the three major operators. China's three major operators, China Mobile, China Telecom and China Unicom, have signed strategic agreements with international communication equipment suppliers such as Nokia and Ericsson totaling more than 20 billion yuan, including the planning and construction of 5G networks. Many of them don't understand why they don't cooperate with Huawei.
Although they have almost the same strength as Huawei and ZTE, Nokia and Ericsson are actually superior to Huawei in some 5G technologies, such as overall planning and intelligent management of 5G networks. Therefore, China Mobile has signed a 5G network cooperation agreement with Nokia, which is more like a consulting service contract. China Mobile also has its own 5G planning and technical team. In fact, the purpose of this agreement should be to learn from others and form a more optimized planning scheme. After all, the 5G network established by domestic operators adopts independent networking mode, which is a high risk, unlike the non-independent networking "wireless broadband" mode that has been commercialized in the United States and South Korea, with less investment and less risk. Therefore, the cooperation between China's three major operators and Nokia and Ericsson, besides some software and hardware procurement, is more planning. In this regard, who can say that Huawei and ZTE did not participate? It's just that they didn't make it public.
Any major infrastructure project in the world needs bidding, especially the management of our state-owned enterprises. Bidding is a necessary process. One of the purposes of bidding is to involve multiple suppliers and avoid being monopolized by one supplier. In the bidding of the three major domestic operators, there are usually many suppliers who win the bid, and so are large international projects. At present, the construction of 5G projects of the three major domestic operators is still in the experimental stage, and will enter the trial commercial construction stage next year. Therefore, domestic 5G projects are at the initial stage of bidding at most, so it cannot be said that the 5G networks of the three major domestic operators all use Nokia instead of Huawei. At that time, after the bidding, many suppliers will enter the supplier list. It is conceivable that Huawei, ZTE, Shinco, Nokia and Ericsson will all be on the list, but the quota allocation of specific equipment is not so open and transparent.
Many people want to know why the three major operators don't cooperate with Huawei. In fact, although Huawei has not claimed to have won any specific 5G projects in China (of course, there are many pilot projects), it has already won the 5G construction project of China Mobile Hongkong Company, which is certain. In addition, on 20 October, 2065 438+08 165438+ London/KLOC-0, Huawei announced that it had won 22 global commercial contracts (concentrated in Europe, the Middle East and China) and shipped more than 1 10,000 5G base stations, which was a good start and an outbreak after Huawei was banned. At the same time, Huawei said that it is also conducting 5G commercial trials (5G trials) with more than 50 global 154 operators. If 22 plus 50 is exactly 50% of 154, it can't be said that Huawei can win all the latter 50 projects, but at least it is expected to get a high market share, and this is the world's.
And recently cooperated with Portugal, so there are already 23 5G contracts!
Many people have said why the three major operators don't cooperate with Huawei. In fact, this is not the case, but they have adopted a diversified development direction, and ZTE and Huawei will inevitably participate in it later. After all, talking about 5G is enough. On the other hand, the same is true of foreign 5G construction. Many countries, including those with which Huawei is now cooperating, are also cooperating with Nokia, so generally speaking, things are not as simple as expected.
As for the cooperation with Qualcomm, it is actually inevitable. After all, Huawei is a processor. In terms of baseband and Internet of Everything, we will eventually cooperate with the three major operators, but the word supply here is not appropriate.
Answer over
This is not written by the landlord at all. It is impossible for the three major domestic operators to choose only Nokia, and of course it is impossible to choose only Huawei. There are three main reasons.
First, the state does not allow, the three major operators are state-owned enterprises, procurement must be tender. It is impossible to choose only one company and recruit only one company.
Second, the three major operators can only choose Huawei, which means that Huawei has a monopoly. The three major operators have to look at Huawei's face to eat. You don't say! General suppliers rely on Party A for their meals, but now it's the other way around.
Third, mutual benefit, which is international. Everyone does business with each other, in exchange for the international market of domestic communication providers such as Huawei and ZTE. If you don't let others in, others can't let you in, except, of course, the United States and other countries.
By the way, Huawei was not strong before. Why can it get bigger? This refers to the supply of communication equipment. The after-sales service is really good. On-call, no delay, no need to worry about overtime. Huawei is fighting for after-sales service.
Why? Because this is an out-and-out false proposition, I want to praise Qualcomm's advanced 5G technology through non-existent false facts. What about the facts? Qualcomm's 5G defeat in China this year:
As we all know, Qualcomm is a technology company, mainly engaged in communication patents, baseband and mobile processors. Its main product is mobile phone processor, which is commonly known in the industry as "buy a processor and send it to baseband". Telecom operators mainly build communication networks to serve communication users, and their upstream partners are mainly able to build communication networks for them, mainly including Huawei, ZTE, Datang, Nokia, Ericsson and other enterprises, such as 4G and 5G. In a word, Qualcomm's main partner is the mobile phone company, and the partners of the three major operators are mainly the companies that build base stations. Therefore, it is impossible for China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom to choose Qualcomm as a 5G supplier, and Qualcomm does not have this business or this technology.
According to the 5G networking construction documents published by China Mobile in early 2065438+2009, it can be found that mobile 5G devices mainly come from Huawei, ZTE, Ericsson, Nokia and Datang, among which Huawei has 250 sets, accounting for about 40% of the total, and it is a big family in 5G construction.
In addition to 5G base stations, Huawei is also the biggest beneficiary of 5G test equipment. China Mobile's tender in September showed that China Mobile purchased 250,000 Huawei 5G terminals, one is 5 CPE Pro and the other is Huawei Mate20 X 5G. Previously, China Mobile also purchased some 5G mobile phones from OPPO, vivo and Xiaomi, which were mainly used for testing. Among these models, Qualcomm's X50 baseband is indeed available, but it is not directly cooperated with Qualcomm.
What is end to end? Simply put, it can build a transmitter and a receiver of 5G signals. Huawei is the only company that can provide a complete 5G solution from base stations to mobile phones. For example, in the case of 5G base station, Huawei developed plough 5G base station chip, and in the case of mobile phone, Huawei developed Ba Long 5005G chip and Kirin 990 5G chip recently. Among them, Ba Long 5005G chip is the one used in Mate20X 5G version, which is not only the first chip supporting NSA+SA dual mode, but also the only chip supporting millimeter wave. As for Kirin 990 5G, it will also adopt the just released Mate30 series 5G version, which is the world's first SOC integrated 5G baseband.
Therefore, we can simply conclude that the subject's problem is a "pseudo-problem". The 5G construction of the three major domestic operators has nothing to do with Qualcomm, but the application of 5G baseband in mobile phones in Qualcomm has something to do with it. Unfortunately, X55 baseband is still in PPT. As for the operators' 5G suppliers, Huawei, Ericsson and Nokia have been the top three in the world in recent years, not to mention others.
This problem is blamed on Nima. Which emperor do you think will always put power on a prime minister or an old cabinet man? Don't you want balance? Also, do you know the list of 5g accessories provided by operators? I don't know. Stop fooling around! ! ! Cisco, Ericsson and Nokia all have them, but Qualcomm has never heard of winning the bid. Maybe I am ignorant. Don't you just want to say that operators are too spicy to support domestic production, or Huawei is too rubbish, and operators don't want it? You achieved one of these two goals, and you succeeded! I think some time ago, that netizen's cultural level was similar, and most of the undergraduate courses were not up to it, let alone undergraduate courses. Now I think junior high school is enough. After all, good and evil people are mixed and internal forces are intertwined. And then there were American dogs mixed in.
Invited to answer questions in this industry.
Qualcomm doesn't produce any communication equipment, so the 3G providers of the three major operators can't include Qualcomm.
It is possible for the three major domestic operators to provide equipment such as base stations and core networks, that is, it is possible for the five equipment vendors in the above communication manufacturing industry, but there is absolutely no communication equipment production in Qualcomm. I don't know where this 5G supplier came from.
Qualcomm's 5G baseband chips will be purchased by many domestic mobile phone manufacturers, and Qualcomm's RF modules will also be launched at the same time, so it is necessary to cooperate with the three major domestic operators for testing, so as to facilitate later access to the network. These collaborations are mainly focused on future 5G mobile phones.
Since the current 5GNR standard has not been completed, the next standards related to the Internet of Things, such as URLLC (Ultra High Reliability and Low Delay) and mMTC (Mass Machine Communication), will not be released until 2020. However, based on Qualcomm's current position in the field of Internet of Things, it is predicted that Qualcomm will probably become the Internet of Things module provider of the three major operators in the future 5G era.
Traditionally, the five major operators in China, such as Huawei, ZTE, Shinco, Nokia and Ericsson, will still focus on 5G-related base stations and core networks. As Shinco returns to the base station core network provider team, it is estimated that the domestic share of China will be around 70%. In other words, the 5G equipment providers of the three major operators will mainly be domestic manufacturers.
If all three major operators choose Qualcomm without Huawei, then why should the United States use state power? It is not enough for one company to suppress Huawei, but why should it unite to suppress Huawei?
If Qualcomm is good, why do Huawei's equipment sell so well in the world and have such a high market share? Are others fools?
When you say that all three major operators choose Qualcomm, you mean that there is no share of Huawei, which is a false proposition and nonsense.
There is only one explanation. You are a traitor, a lackey, a spokesman for Qualcomm, Apple and the United States.
This question is somewhat profound, and my remarks are my own thoughts. Don't spray!
First of all, to correct it, the 5G suppliers here refer to X50 chips in Qualcomm, and the suppliers we think refer to equipment vendors (Huawei, ZTE, Nokia, Ericsson, etc.). ).
Why did the three major operators choose X50 chip? I think:
You can't put your eggs in the same basket. I believe Huawei and ZTE still have a chance. Let's wait and see!
After all, the three major operators and Huawei still have cooperation!
Network geek, with a new perspective and new ideas, will accompany you to travel in the magical online world.
The specific reason has to start with the patent voting incident of 5G chips. Huawei lost by one vote.
At that time, it was because of the voting gate incident that a domestic enterprise was accused;
Ok, let's see what these three operators have cooperated with Qualcomm. How much benefit can Qualcomm get from China every year?
At present, there are 5 124 5G patents in the world.
To put it simply, every time a 5G mobile phone is manufactured in the future, it will provide Qualcomm with a 5% share of patent fees;
According to preliminary calculations, Qualcomm takes away about $50 billion in patent fees from China every year.
How to treat Huawei's failure in the 5G patent voting?
Welcome to leave a message to discuss, like a little attention.
Because Qualcomm is the best.
Chip giant Qualcomm is a global leader in the research and development of 3G, 4G and 5G technologies.
The founder, Dr. Irwin Mark Jacobs, taught in Massachusetts 13 years, engaged in satellite communication technology consultation 17 years, and later founded Qualcomm in 1985.
From 1989, Qualcomm (high-quality communication) began to promote CDMA, 1993, CDMA became the industry standard, and in 20 16, the World Mobile Communications Congress announced the launch of 5G, which showed the innovative 5G design with high efficiency and low delay. Always being chased, never being surpassed.
The industry benchmark is not only 3G, 4G4G, 5G modem communication technology.
Qualcomm's CPU is basically autonomous or semi-autonomous architecture (Huawei Hisilicon CPU is arm architecture). The main frequency from Scorpion to Krait to Kyro kernel (Xiaolong 835/845) is close to 3g, and 10 nm technology leads the industry (Snapdragon 855 will reach 7 nm technology).
Qualcomm's GPU Adreno GPU, ranging from Adreno 530 of Xiaolong 820/82 1 to Adreno 630 of 845, has the highest performance in the industry.
Qualcomm's AI Third Generation Qualcomm? Hexagon? 685 DSP supports mature terminal artificial intelligence processing to create a richer camera, voice, augmented reality and game experience.
Qualcomm can also realize a series of forward-looking functions such as AR, VR, MR (mixed reality) and XR (immersive augmented reality).
Refer to my article/item/6634308615502551/