How to solve the negative evaluation of patent evaluation report?

1, the correction procedure is close to the reexamination of the invention patent, and the examiner at the time of correction is generally not an examiner who makes an evaluation and does not need to contact;

2. It's hard to say that documents retrieved by examiners are generally not regarded as errors. Let's talk about novelty directly. Furthermore, if you think that the comparison document is incorrect, wouldn't it be more beneficial for you to explain novelty?

3, exclusive rights are not creative, and examiners generally ignore subordinate creativity and say a few words in general. If the examiner thinks that a right is creative and the infringing product belongs to the protection scope of the right, how to use it ~