What are the requirements for the requester of the patent evaluation report?

1. What are the requirements of the patent evaluation report for the applicant? If the patentee refuses to accept the conclusion of the patent evaluation report, he may request correction. However, if the evaluation report contains one of the following errors, namely, the project information or text description is wrong, the patent evaluation report making procedure is wrong, the applicable law is obviously wrong, the facts on which the conclusion is based are obviously wrong or other errors that should be corrected, he may request correction within two months after receiving the evaluation report. Where the claimant makes a request for correction, he shall make a request in the form of an opinion statement, stating the contents to be corrected and the reasons for correction, but the patent document shall not be amended. If the examination team considers that the reasons for correction are not valid, and the original patent evaluation report is correct and does not need to be corrected, it shall issue a notice of examination opinions on the patent evaluation report, explaining the reasons for not correcting, and the correction procedure shall be terminated. If the review team believes that the reasons for correction are valid and the original patent evaluation report contains errors that need to be corrected, it shall issue a corrected patent evaluation report, and indicate in the corrected patent evaluation report that the report will replace the original patent evaluation report, and the correction procedure will be terminated. The department that made the patent evaluation report can also correct the existing mistakes by itself. Generally speaking, the patent evaluation report is only allowed to make a request for correction once, but the requester can make a request for correction again for the patent evaluation report made by the review team after supplementary retrieval. Second, the role of the patent evaluation report (1) in the customs filing. Customs filing of intellectual property rights is beneficial for customs departments to take the initiative to seize suspected infringing articles in their daily work. The patentee provides a patent evaluation report at the time of filing, and the customs has more confidence in its seizure based on its trust in the legal stability of the patent. (two) the role in the Canton Fair or other exhibitions. When the patentee voluntarily provides the patent evaluation report, the intellectual property management departments at the Canton Fair and other exhibitions can more actively accept complaints and reject the relevant defenses of the suspected infringer. (three) the role in patent licensing, pledge, transfer and shareholding. Under the above-mentioned usage mode of patent right, the licensee, pledgee, assignee and relevant interested parties of patent right are more likely to reach a transaction with the patentee and reduce the transaction time. (four) the role in patent administrative complaints. The patent administration department will ask the complainant to provide a patent evaluation report. Once the infringement is found, the patentee will ask the State Council to issue a patent evaluation report. Considering that it takes more than two months to issue an evaluation report, it will bring unnecessary waiting for timely infringement. (5) Its role in patent infringement litigation. Similarly, when an infringement lawsuit is filed and a patent evaluation report is provided, even if the defendant declares it invalid within the defense period, the court will generally not suspend the trial. At the same time, the court is more willing to accept the plaintiff's application for evidence preservation and property preservation. On the contrary, the patentee needs to wait for the evaluation report for more than two months after discovering the infringement suspect. If the case is still not provided at the time of filing, once the other party declares it invalid within the defense period, the court should generally suspend the trial; In addition, for the plaintiff's application for property preservation, the court is often unwilling to exercise the patent right for fear of legal stability. Patent evaluation report is a way for people who don't know more about patents, so the evaluation report is necessary. On the one hand, it is to make users more aware of its purpose, but also to stimulate the purchasing potential of those who may need it. On the other hand, it is the best way to make products available. Since it is a time-consuming and labor-intensive research and development, of course, I don't want to be unknown.