#高考# Introduction People often say that those who are good at essays will win the world, and those who are good at essays will win the college entrance examination. In fact, this is not an exaggeration at all. Composition accounts for up to 60% of the Chinese language score in the college entrance examination, exceeding the total score of the entire Chinese language. One-third of the total, so we must pay attention to it and seize every opportunity to write a composition. What I want to share with you below is a sample essay for the 2020 College Entrance Examination. I hope you can take a look at what other students have written, compare it with yourselves, find the gaps, and keep working hard.
Write as requested.
A debate topic in the variety show "Qi Pa Shuo" caused heated discussion: "Qi Pa Planet's new technology can allow all human brains to share knowledge in one second. Do you support it?" Many people participated in it. Expressed his own opinion. Some people say, if what I know through my own efforts is known to all mankind, would it be unfair to me? Some people also believe that the enjoyment of knowledge does not mean the enjoyment of ability. Knowledge is open to everyone, but abilities, thinking, aesthetics, etc. still need to be cultivated by oneself; others say that the enjoyment of knowledge will Will it not breed laziness and lead to loss of creativity? Others believe that the sharing of knowledge allows us to open the door to every world. It avoids more dangers and injuries caused by ignorance and can even save lives.
What do you think about this? Please write an article based on this.
Requirements: (1) Prepare your own topic; (2) No less than 800 words.
Let patents grow quietly in the tide of knowledge sharing
Article | No. 1 candidate
"Let the human brain share knowledge in one second ” is not only a hypothetical debate topic, but also seems to be an expectation in the hearts of many people. Li Dazhao once said: "Knowledge is the candle that guides life to the realm of light and truth." Therefore, many debaters are full of longing, imagining all the beauties brought by "one second of knowledge sharing", and depicting a great unity. A blueprint of the world. There is nothing wrong with this, but this idea is the simplest vision, because in their ideal, they ignore the existence of a thing called "patent".
Patent is named "Exclusive" and it belongs to an individual. Zhai Tianlin's academic fraud incident dominated the hot search for many days, and it was even known to passers-by. Zhai Tianlin, a Ph.D. from Beijing Film Academy, has had his Ph.D. revoked because of plagiarism in an academic article he published while studying for his Ph.D., and his supervisor has also been disqualified from being a Ph.D. supervisor. The Beijing Film Academy stated that it has zero tolerance for academic fraud. There are many ways of academic fraud, but plagiarism is not only academic fraud, but also an illegal act that infringes on the intellectual property rights of others. Zero tolerance, that's a must.
We all know that Bacon said "knowledge is the power of all abilities", but we don't know that there is a continuation behind this sentence: Knowledge is a selfless horse, who can control it , to whom it belongs. Based on this, we should also understand that the sharing of knowledge allows everyone to master the same amount of knowledge, which ultimately means that everyone has no power. In the progress of human society, there is always a distinction between advanced and backward. "If you fall behind, you will be beaten." Whether it is technological backwardness, military backwardness, or even economic backwardness, we must all be controlled by others. In ancient times, Qin became the overlord because it mastered advanced bronze smelting technology; in modern times, the United States intimidates all parties because it masters advanced military weapons. Therefore, all development and strength lies in mastering advanced technology and mastering core technology. In short, only by mastering patents and owning your own intellectual property rights can such knowledge be called "power".
Looking at the world’s most powerful companies, they all attach great importance to independent research and development and usually own a large number of patents. These patents will not be used to enjoy, but will be protected more strictly. Network communications have reached the 5G era. Huawei, which is at the forefront of this field, will not share this core technology with others, but will take more stringent measures to prevent it from being stolen; China is known as the pen empire, but Japan will not share the core technology of producing pen refills with us just because we are a fountain pen empire, but will use this technology to make huge profits.
The idea of ??“allowing human brains to share knowledge in one second” has become more and more possible with the development of science and technology, but knowledge sharing is not a fig leaf for stealing patents. Patent protection will not be replaced or revoked due to the development trend of knowledge sharing. Only when patent protection and knowledge sharing go hand in hand and develop simultaneously can they conform to the laws of social development and jointly promote social progress.
Question review intention
Detailed explanation
Question review: This question tests students’ writing ability. This is a material composition question. Answering this type of question requires students to review the material before writing, and students must understand that reviewing the material is not just about reading the material, but also a thinking process for analyzing and understanding the material. After reading the material thoroughly, you need to clarify the main content of the material, grasp the basic intention of the person who asked the question, accurately understand the meaning of the question, and compose as required. This material can be interpreted in two parts. The first part quotes a hotly debated debate topic in the variety show "Qi Pa Shuo" to introduce the topic of this essay: "Sharing Knowledge". The second part quotes four typical views on knowledge sharing. The first three are doubts and concerns about "knowledge sharing", and the fourth is recognition of its great significance. This part is to help candidates open up their minds and clarify the direction of their debate. With the rapid development of science and technology, there has been a fierce collision between technology, knowledge and human nature, morality, and law, which has inspired many exam preparation topics. The topic of knowledge sharing has a distinct flavor of the times and is of very practical significance to the majority of candidates who are the beneficiaries and promoters of the technological era. This essay is not difficult to review. It just needs to be noted that according to the four opinions in the material, candidates must look at the pros and cons of knowledge sharing objectively and dialectically, and cannot completely affirm or deny it. The sharing of knowledge is inevitable and necessary for the development of society and science and technology. How to solve existing problems and avoid possible problems so that knowledge can serve and promote human development in sharing is the correct direction that should be grasped in the demonstration. This article is suitable for writing an argumentative essay.
Reference intention:
(1) The sharing of knowledge promotes the overall progress of society;
(2) The sharing of knowledge must be in Detour before knowledge patents;
(3) The sharing of knowledge does not mean the sharing of abilities.
Reference structure:
Let patents grow quietly in the tide of knowledge sharing
The first part quotes materials and raises questions.
On the first level, first of all, it is pointed out that "letting the human brain share knowledge in one second" seems to be an expectation of many people. Then he quoted Li Dazhao's famous saying to analyze the reasons for this expectation. With a twist of the pen, he raised a question: They ignored the existence of "patents". All linked together, starting with a few questions.
The second level, following the above, explains the patent characteristics in detail. Use the academic fraud incident of Zhai Tianlin as negative material to prove that the patent belongs to an individual.
The second part expands layer by layer to analyze the problem. The significance of owning a "patent" will be explained in detail from two perspectives.
The first level, first theory, then examples, discusses how to master patents and have your own intellectual property rights. Only such knowledge can be called "power".
On the second level, examples are given to illustrate that companies attach importance to independent research and development, and owning patents is equivalent to having wealth.
The third part echoes the beginning and end to solve the problem. First, rebate materials, and then clarify the methods. Only by allowing patent protection and knowledge sharing to go hand in hand and develop simultaneously can they be in line with the laws of social development and jointly promote social progress.