After much thought, I decided to buy the OPPO Watch 2 "ECG Edition".
This is also my first time using an O-series wearable product. The main wearable device I currently use is Huawei Watch3. After looking around the entire internet, there are almost no detailed comparative reviews between the two.
If I don’t go to hell, who will? , then Guangyan risked being besieged by two die-hard fans, and from the perspective of an ordinary user, he experienced the OPPO Watch 2 ECG version in depth, and by the way, made a comprehensive comparison with Huawei Watch3!
(Probably the most detailed comparative evaluation on the entire Internet!)
This evaluation mainly adopts a "semi-question and answer format"
The output of personal opinions is relatively large, supplemented by the expression of objective data. Therefore, the evaluation content is highly subjective and only represents personal opinions. If you have different opinions, please feel free to discuss them in the comment area.
OPPO Watch 2 ECG
Content Description
For convenience, in the following:
"OPPO Watch 2 ECG Edition" is referred to as " OW2"
"Huawei Watch 3" is referred to as "HW3"
The content experienced is limited to the following conditions:
OW2 firmware version: OW20W3 11 A. 51 d784fa8b
OPPO Health app version: 3.9.8 c02f8db 211109
HW3 firmware version: 2.0.0.198
Huawei Sports Health version: 12.0.10.310
p>Test date: November 2021
This is a very long article. If you want to selectively read it, please refer to the table of contents:
① Preface
② What do you think of the appearance of OW2?
③ What does OW2 do better than HW3?
④ What is OW2 not as good as HW3?
⑤ What are the aspects that affect the experience? (and suggestions)
⑥ Any comprehensive evaluation and purchase suggestions for OW2?
⑦ What is Guangyan’s opinion on the smart wearable industry?
Let’s talk about the conclusion first: Compared with HW3 appearance, OW2 is completely defeated
If you want to see the unboxing and real photos, you can click here: View link
Come here Tell me why OW2 was completely defeated?
Rather than saying it is a battle over the appearance of HW3 and OW2, it is better to say that it is a battle over smartwatches. In fact, this is a matter of different opinions and is very subjective, just like tofu. There is no standard answer to the brain’s salty-sweet debate.
As for my personal opinions, let me apply the opinions output in my previous review of HW3
(see link):
Huawei with a round dial HW3
The reason why I personally agree with the circular dial is:
Although the rectangular dial can obtain a greater amount of information, I do not think that the watch is a device that needs to obtain a large amount of information. The purpose is to obtain key information, so I personally think that this advantage is not enough to support its form;
Personally, I think the round dial looks better and is closer to a traditional watch. While its decorative properties are stronger, it is also weakened. Fang Biao’s overly technological and inconsistent sense, and its more unobtrusive design can be adapted to more formal and informal occasions;
Because Apple Watch is so successful, it has high market awareness and stands out from the crowd. .
Even though "square" and "circle" are both basic graphics, objectively speaking, square smart watches will give people a feeling of "imitating" Apple, including OW2;
Comprehensive As mentioned above, regarding these two watches with different dial shapes, I personally prefer the round dial design of HW3. Appearance is also one of the biggest factors that made me buy HW3 before. After all, as an explicit wearable product, decoration is still an important consideration.
Of course, since I will buy OW2, it proves that although I prefer round dials, I definitely don’t hate square dials.
Among the products with square dials, OW2 is relatively "characteristic" in terms of design and details. For example, the hyperboloid design not only improves the operating feel, but also improves the operation feel to a certain extent. The overall sense of refinement and the sense of conflict with AW are reduced.
(PS: Students who are familiar with Guangyan should know that I have always admired hyperboloids, including mobile phones.)
Especially the ECG version of OW2, the overall texture will be better than The regular version is several levels higher. It is the only version in the entire series that uses "316L stainless steel" watch body, "ceramic" back case and "sapphire glass" photoelectric sensor element cover. The overall texture is still very outstanding. The use of materials is exactly the same as that of HW3. The two can be compared on the wrist. Whether it looks good or not depends on each person, but the texture displayed by both is one of the best smart watches currently on the market.
OW2 display
1. Interactive experience
This is the most obvious perception after converting from HW3 to OW2.
To describe this difference in perception, assuming that the AW experience is 10 points, OW2 can reach 7-8 points, while HW3 is around 5 points.
First of all, the overall smoothness is very good, almost comparable to Apple!
Of course, it can also be said to be imitating Apple. With Apple as a good teacher, it is much easier for the OW2 student to start the project (according to rumors, OPPO also hired engineers from AW?), including the interactive logic, and he can learn it fluently, plus the rectangular dial , and overall it is more in line with the interactive experience used on mobile phones.
In terms of results, it’s very good.
Secondly, in terms of motion and visual effects, for some unknown reason, HW3 canceled many motion and visual effects in subsequent system updates, such as notification animations, background blur, and excessive animations. It may be that For battery life, it’s surprising.
On OW2, it can be said that there is enough to satisfy your needs! Objectively speaking, it is currently the best product among non-Apple smart watches (perhaps none).
Apple Watch expresses a question mark on its face
2. Ecological construction
Let’s talk about ecological construction. This is also a "bottleneck" for current non-Apple smart watches. "And it hurts forever. What's more, all hardware manufacturers cannot avoid the topic, and neither company is satisfactory in this regard.
At this stage, OW2 has a total of about 64 applications on the shelves. Of course, this data is somewhat watered-down because the thief OPPO has also put some system applications in the application market. There are probably around 50 third-party applications.
All apps currently on the OW store
You may want to ask: Huh? No, from this point of view, there is no advantage over HW3. In terms of quantity, it is not as good as Huawei, but it has more? !
The reason why OW2 has a better ecosystem is mainly reflected in two aspects:
The first aspect is that the application "quality" and "independence" of OW2 are higher.
Take the Baidu map that has both as an example:
The storage size of the Baidu map downloaded by the HW3 store is less than 1M, while the storage size of the Baidu map downloaded by the OPPO watch store reaches 44M! This huge disparity is reflected in functionality. Most applications on HW3, including Baidu Maps, still cannot be used without mobile phones, and their functions are relatively simple. It is more like a "small program" than an APP, and is more suitable for RTOS systems such as GT 2PRO. For example, this idea is also adopted in the recent Amzfit RTOS devices. HW3 does not reflect its hardware advantages.
Moreover, Huawei is proud of its Hongmeng distributed capabilities. In fact, OW and AW also support it, supporting the delivery of key information from mobile phones to the watch screen, such as navigation, taxis, flights and other key information.
Not to mention "national applications" such as QQ, WeChat and music, Huawei currently does not have any (but it is said to be in negotiation, wait for HW4).
However, it needs to be pointed out that in fact, I don’t think it is a wise choice to do work on the watch that can be easily done on the mobile phone. Its real significance may lie in covering independent functions in occasional scenarios. Even if its usage scenarios only account for 1/10 of all scenarios, such as when your phone is out of battery, or when you go out for exercise, you can use the watch alone to maintain a basic connection with the outside world without bringing your phone.
But in fact, the Hongmeng Watch based on AOSP is capable of independent applications (refer to the third-party ADB application installation), and the hardware foundation is there, we can look forward to subsequent updates. The only fetter may be Battery life has improved and progress has been made (obviously I can’t wait any longer).
The second aspect is: OW2's "third-party" scalability is stronger. Thanks to the magic modification of Android, there is no need to shy away from wearing the Hongmeng hat like HW3 (don’t blame me for pollen, this is what Huawei engineers said on Weibo). In addition, unlike HW3, OW2 has a round screen. The adaptation is much simpler. You can use ADB to install some apps that are not in the official app market, such as Kuan, Bilibili, Douyin, etc.
For example, third-party application market, Etralab
3. Information display
Needless to say, no matter in terms of information display density, typesetting, etc., OW3 Square dials have great advantages.
The round dial can almost only display key information in the play.
But this has little impact on message notifications and other aspects. As I said before, the watch does not need to receive and process complex information.
It may be more consistent with mobile phones in terms of application adaptation and user habits, making it more universal. At the same time, neat layout also helps to obtain information quickly.
4. Battery life and charging
"Full smart phone can be used for 4 days"
"Charge for 10 minutes and use for a whole day"
These two slogans are important promotional selling points of OW2.
I verified this. The first thing is that the fully intelligent mode lasts for 4 days! real! of! It can basically reach 3.5-4 days
HW3’s previous press conference promoted 4 days (later the promotional page changed it to 3 days), but in actual use, it only lasted just over 2 days. I thought that OW2 would also have a "virtual standard", but the actual measurement result is that according to my previous use model of HW3, it can achieve 4 days!
This should be mainly related to OW2’s larger 510mAh battery (60mAh more than HW3) and its advertised “dual-engine battery life”, which is described in detail in the manufacturer’s promotional video and review. , I won’t go into details. In short, the result is the top level of battery life among all smart watches. I am responsible for this sentence.
Fast charging
Then there is charging. After being tortured by HW3, the contrast brought by OW2’s charging speed is like the “tortoise and the hare”.
The full charging process of HW3 takes about 90 to 120 minutes depending on the room temperature.
OW2 takes about 40 to 60 minutes, which is basically only half the time of HW3, or even less.
The reason for this has also been mentioned in my previous in-depth test of HW3. It is mainly due to the choice between "wired" and "wireless" charging by different manufacturers. Due to the limited size of the watch, poor heat dissipation, and wireless charging The charging power cannot be increased, resulting in the charging time of all products using wireless charging, including HW3.
On the other hand, contact wired charging similar to Oumei is not so "high-end", and its universality is not as good as wireless. There may even be contact oxidation problems in the future, but it can be done " "Quickly" "quickly".
I personally agree with this trade-off, and the improved experience it brings outweighs the disadvantages.
HW3
Generally speaking, long battery life and fast charging are the best way to reduce battery life anxiety under the premise that there is no breakthrough development in batteries. I agree with OPPO’s pragmatic approach on this point. ideas.
5. Cost-effectiveness
This should not be mentioned in the first place. After all, different people have different definitions of "cost-effectiveness". Even for HW3, I don’t think it’s as expensive as many people say. Demand defines value. This is also the result of natural competition in the market. There is no good or bad.
In comparison, OW2's price/performance ratio is indeed quite high. Even the ECG version only costs over 2K on a third-party platform. In terms of comprehensive product strength, this price is relatively conscientious. It can be seen that Green Factory still wants to get a piece of the cake in the wear market.
6. Equipment opening
Although generally the ecological combination of products within the same brand is the best.
But Huawei has gone too far. There are many artificial barriers to manufacturing equipment. Anyone who has used Huawei wearable products should know that Huawei wearables are very unfriendly to support non-Huawei mobile phones! Especially for iPhone users, not only are general functions unavailable, but battery life is also directly reduced by half.
Many core functions and core selling points will be missing, including but not limited to: cross-screen information delivery, heart health research, sleep breathing screening, one-touch transmission, etc. See the table below for details.
Function restrictions of HW3 on non-Huawei mobile phones
OW2 will be much better, although some functions will still depend on the cooperation of the Color OS system, such as: e-sports mode and Take photos remotely. But generally speaking, they are all insignificant, non-core functions that do not affect the core experience.
In fact, I don’t understand the significance of Huawei’s semi-closed policy when it only has existing equipment and not many new equipment.
7. Maintenance Outlook
This point starts from my journey towards HW3. From the initial purchase to the time I want to sell it, HW3 has given me the "understanding" from the beginning. ” turned into “puzzled”. There is a saying: “Have the courage to admit your mistakes and never change your mind.”
During the use of HW3, I communicated with Huawei engineers online and on the phone countless times. I feel that they want to do a good job and their attitude is sincere, but one week, two weeks, one month, two months, I really can't wait any longer. Even during the communication, internal employees revealed their contradictions and lack of confidence in this product.
The appearance is really good
In contrast, OW3 has a good product foundation, and is generally different from Huawei in the wearable market. OPPO Those who belong to the "attacking side" will be relatively more proactive, and the profit pressure in the short term should not be that great.
For example, in Kuan, there is a product manager @Lubia who often communicates and listens to users. In this regard, Huawei lacks a more direct vertical feedback interaction channel, and overall it is still a bit "arrogant" .
However, there is one thing I would like to ask everyone here. It seems that non-OPPO users cannot use the OPPO community app? How to give feedback?
8. Other details
Automatic exercise recording and pause are much more sensitive than Huawei. In addition to time thresholds, Huawei also has heart rate parameter thresholds, which are difficult to trigger.
The link stability of non-brands is also higher than that of HW3. Because Huawei needs to install HMS, the stability of maintaining two backends at the same time is even worse. The power consumption of HMS cannot be underestimated.
Furthermore, probably due to the shape of the screen, most of the advanced operations of HW3 need to be completed on the mobile phone, such as viewing sleep results and so on. The overall impact of this is not very big, but for some people it is objectively missing an interactive step.
The voice assistant of OW2 is also much better than Xiaoyi of HW3, mainly in that it is easier to wake up and has more powerful functions, basically close to Xiaobu on the mobile phone.
Having said so much about the "goodness" of OW2, naturally there are also shortcomings. As Huawei, the former king of the wearable market, HW3 is still better than OW2 in the following aspects.
1. Great Health
"Health", as the "unique skill" of smart wearable products, cannot be achieved by non-personal mobile phones, so the performance of health on smart watches has changed. It's very important. At this point, thanks to Huawei's years of data and ecological accumulation, it can be said to be the best among domestic manufacturers.
In fact, at the hardware level, everyone is pretty much the same. To put it simply, these are PPG, ECG, blood oxygen and some gravity-sensing acceleration sensors. The detection accuracy has long been able to reach above 95%, and the difference 1 and 2 are of little significance. For example, the hardware and software of ECG are also provided by Haoluowei. HW3 has more "Schr?dinger" body temperature monitoring.
The main thing OW2 lacks is that it is not as good as Huawei in processing and analyzing the collected information. "Integration of software and hardware" is very important in smart wear.
So how does Huawei differentiate its pain points compared to the products of its competitors?
The answer is that Huawei provides a signature interpretation service, which is like going to a temple and shaking a signature. As for whether the signature is an upper signature or a lower signature, you need to ask someone to interpret it. If the signature is a lower signature, you still need to Someone has given you some advice, and the "unlocking" projects provided by Huawei include:
Scientific sleep analysis and apnea screening;
Heart health research;
Vascular Health Study;
Respiratory Disease Screening (pending OTA);
And soon to be released:
Coronary Heart Disease Screening Study;
Hypertension Screening Study.
These health research projects in cooperation with top domestic medical institutions or colleges are of great practical significance. They "decode" the numbers in the test results and even provide one-stop services such as medical service appointments and return visits. . Very helpful in screening specific high-risk groups.
Take heart health research as an example. According to data released by Huawei: Since the launch of the heart health research project, as of March, more than 2.47 million users have participated in the project, and more than 10,000 people have passed This project screened out patients with a high risk of arrhythmia, and the screening accuracy rate reached over 90%. Don't tell me, I actually have a friend who received a follow-up call from the customer service of the 301 hospital because of "apnea".
Although OPPO has made efforts in this area, such as the launch of "Snoring Monitoring" and "Heart Rate Warning", it is still somewhat unsatisfactory. For example, the accuracy of the sleep monitoring algorithm is still not enough compared to Huawei's. It is accurate, the trigger threshold of blood oxygen monitoring is also too high, and the interpretation of ECG and PPG heart rate is not as comprehensive as Huawei's, etc.
Not only that, OPPO’s “big health hardware ecosystem” is far less rich than Huawei’s, with only a handful of ecological hardware.
After years of development, Huawei has become relatively rich and has a lot of options to choose from: such as the recently released ECG watch strap, convenient blood glucose meter, etc.
Huawei’s big health ecological hardware has an overwhelming advantage
Finally, it seems that the ECG of OW2 does not have Class II medical device certification like the first generation. It is not clear why. The certification has not been completed yet, or there is no certification at all. You can ask @Lubia.
2. Sports experience
This is not to say that OW2’s motion detection is inaccurate. On the contrary, OW2’s automatic motion recognition and pause are much better than Huawei’s. It can be seen that the underlying algorithm is not bad. What I’m talking about here mainly refers to “experience”.
Generally speaking, there are still some shortcomings in functionality and details:
For example, Huawei watch can achieve automatic synchronization of movement when the watch is connected to a mobile phone. The two work together and the mobile phone starts to move. Start recording your heart rate on the watch, and when you start exercising, the watch will automatically sync to your phone for real-time viewing of routes and other information, which OPPO cannot do.
The second is the sports recording data, which is more detailed and intuitive compared to Huawei. And more data is provided on the watch, which will be mentioned again in the later client experience.
Huawei also has real-time dynamic route records on the watch and dynamic track videos on the mobile phone. The most important thing is that there are many sports and fitness courses accumulated over the years.
3. Hardware performance
Generally speaking,
The hardware configuration of OW2’s 4100 Apollo4s 1GRAM 8GROM and HW3’s Kirin 710L Kirin A1 2GRAM 16GROM are processed The level of the equipment is about the same, there is not much difference. It is approximately equal to the performance level of flagship phones seven or eight years ago.
However, OW2 still lacks sincerity in terms of storage and memory. For example, with 1G of storage, when an app is opened in the foreground, it will often cause the background to be killed, including the background of instant messaging software.
In addition, the actual use of 8G storage is not generous. For such a feature-rich watch, this storage is somewhat stretched. This storage and storage limitation may affect subsequent upgrades and use during the life cycle of this watch.
Huawei and Apple are quite generous in this regard, and have upgraded the specifications to a level close to that of mobile phones. However, although Huawei is generous, its ecological shortcomings are somewhat empty and have nowhere to put its talents to use.
4. Client App Experience
It should be noted that this part is highly subjective and is only for reference. OPPO's recently updated health app client has made significant progress overall, but overall there is still a certain experience gap with Huawei's client.
From the interface
Let’s look at the homepage first. The layout ideas of the two are roughly the same. However, the functions of OPPO Health app are not as focused and direct as those of Huawei.
The sports interface, OPPO Health is too simple, it can even be said to be crude. The Huawei Sports and Health app has many courses, and the quality is very good, which is completely comparable to third-party professional apps. In the early days, most of the courses were free. Recently, it seems that a membership system has been launched, but the fees are not high.
From the perspective of user experience
OPPO lacks "user incentives"
For example, in terms of dynamic video tracks, this is not only recording, but also social sharing property. I often see dynamic videos of athletes running several kilometers every day on WeChat Moments, because the nature of exercise is "anti-human" and requires "showing off" and "vanity" to motivate.
Huawei has done a good job in user incentives. For example, the “medals” are richer and more high-quality compared to OPPO. In addition, sports activities will be held regularly every month to achieve certain achievements through sports. Small words will pop up from time to time to encourage you or spur you on, making you feel connected to the device.
Huawei’s dynamic trajectory video
Judging from the data.
OW2 can basically only view the data and charts in the interface at a glance, without even dragging the time slider. However, Huawei can not only view the charts in full screen, but also overlay charts and drag the time. Node slider.
Judging from the display of data such as heart rate, blood oxygen, and sleep, Huawei's is relatively more intuitive. OPPO "borrows" from AW, but it is somewhat abstract.
Finally, as mentioned earlier, OPPO’s “healthy” ecological hardware circle has just started, and it lacks Huawei’s ability to access a variety of ecological hardware.
5. IOT Ecological Framework
In fact, as a personal device, smart watches are originally very suitable as control terminals. However, OPPO’s smart home appliance ecology is unfortunately not satisfactory. Curve to save the country is controlled through Tmall Genie, but this brings about serious lack of integration and depth of experience.
Take an example scenario: When I am watching TV in bed and fall asleep inadvertently, the smart watch detects that I have fallen asleep for a certain period of time and will automatically turn off the lights and TV for me. After all, light and noise affect sleep. . This is a case where smart wearable personal attributes bring control to smart homes.
6. Other details
Needless to say, AOD is essential if you want the watch to look more like a watch. Although it will affect battery life, it can be used together in some occasions. Watches with dark screens still look silly, but I heard they are already being made.
The sedentary reminder is not as sensitive as HW3. I often sit there for several hours without being prompted. There also seems to be no reminder to wash hands. I occasionally lose data on sleep monitoring.
Furthermore, there is a lack of peripheral products for watches. Since OW2 is a customized interface, the third-party accessory straps are far inferior to the HW3 that uses a 22mm universal strap. There is not even a reliable adapter for 22mm watches. The adapter buckles that come with them are hard to find.
Finally, in the watch face market, OW2 is lacking. They are basically official watch faces. The advantage is that they are free and the quality is basically guaranteed.
However, without third-party developers, the number and creativity of the entire watch face is still lacking. We hope to open up third-party development tools and create a dial market ecosystem.
1. Children’s WeChat experience
The logic of receiving messages on Children’s WeChat is a bit buggy. For example, our phone is disconnected from the watch, but my phone is still in use and I can see the message. , when I go to open WeChat on the watch, all the WeChat messages after the disconnection will be pushed aside, and the avatar will jump horizontally alone...
Another one is that in certain scenes, children's WeChat messages will appear. Note, the shame is overwhelming.
Finally, after logging into WeChat on the computer, if you mute the phone and wait for the computer to go offline, the phone will naturally remain muted. Here again, I would like to send my friendly greetings to Mr. Zhang Xiaolong.
Children’s WeChat can only be an excessive plan after all. Let’s see when Zhang Xiao will come up with a serious watch version.
2. OPPO health details
This is still the issue mentioned before, creating a "sports health closed loop" and improving "courses" and "user incentives".
3. Interface interaction details
No matter how I look at this application list interface, I think the interface interchange between HW3 and OW2 will be more perfect?
One is to stuff a square list into a round list!
One is to stuff a circular list into a square table!
Don’t you think it’s a waste to waste four corners on a smart watch’s precious screen? ! Moreover, OW2 does not have the rotating crown of HW3, which is not pleasant to use.
Speaking of the application interface, other places have borrowed the operation logic on the mobile phone, but only to uninstall the application, you need to click into the application list, find the application market, and then find the sub-menu before uninstalling. .
Why can't we learn from the logic of mobile phones? After long pressing the icon, in addition to moving the position, a trash can label will be displayed on the four empty corners. Drag it directly to the corner to confirm the uninstall.
It is recommended to refer to Samsung and Huawei to add "gesture operations" to the watch, such as rubbing your fingers to open payment codes, making fists to answer calls, etc.
The reason is that in the usage scenario of smart watches, there is no guarantee that it can be operated with both hands. If you need to adjust your hand posture to achieve it, it is better to just open your hand for convenience. (For example, I am eating crayfish)
Having said all that, for me personally, what is the OPPO Watch 2 ECG version?
Generally speaking, my overall experience of using OW2 is mostly positive. In comparison with HW3, I cannot simply say who is better and who is worse. Generally speaking, in terms of ecological construction, health and safety that require long-term investment, In terms of algorithm resources, OW2 is still slightly inferior.
In terms of basic experience, user understanding and ecological construction of the watch, it is more complete than HW3.
My personal opinion is: OW2 can cover more user groups and needs, and is more intelligent. I am quite satisfied with this product and can give it 8/10 points.
It is said that the "full smart watch" in the Android world is a trap.
So much so that Huawei only released the second generation of Watch 4 years after it released the first generation.
So much so that even Xiaomi Watch, which has strong appeal among fans, has suffered from poor sales.
So much so that major manufacturers have repeatedly jumped painfully between Wear OS, modified Android, and self-developed systems, and even the application ecology needs to be discussed one by one.
I have only one expectation for OPPO Watch and other manufacturers: hold on, the road is dangerous and long. I believe that it is the darkness before dawn, and as people pay more and more attention to healthy life, an outbreak will always come.
As for purchasing suggestions
I think OW2 may not be particularly suitable for professional sports users and users who have high expectations for smart ecology.
If you have particularly strict requirements on the appearance of your watch and don’t like the shape of a square watch at all, then there is no need to consider it at all.
It should be more suitable for young people such as geeks, white-collar workers and students who like to mess around, want to get rid of battery life anxiety to a certain extent, and want a smart terminal to share part of the anxiety of mobile phones. Among them, OW2 is very competitive and I personally recommend it.
Has the wearable industry entered a bottleneck period?
Some people say yes, because the homogeneity of hardware and software on the market is becoming increasingly serious, and each company is making up for shortcomings and learning from each other.
For users, it seems that smart wearable products have become dispensable. There is no strong demand to stimulate purchase, even if it is as strong as AW, the demand for daily use is 80, a small bracelet It can be done too.
But I personally remain optimistic. The bottleneck of smart wear is far from reached, and may even be at the bottom of the bottle. There is still a lot of depth and breadth to explore. It's not the lack of investment that's caused by weak demand, it's the weak demand that's caused by not doing enough. Don't reverse cause and effect.
In depth
Take smart watches as an example. Notification, sports, health and intelligence, these four carriages, have not yet conquered all.
At the health level, each company has not made enough use of existing sensors and optimized algorithms, and the coverage of different scenarios and different user groups is not complete enough. Monitoring stability and diverse customization is also not enough. As for new sensors, even if they are as powerful as Huawei, the "respiratory health research" based on body temperature sensors has been repeatedly delayed and stranded.
There is still some way to go before smart wearables can truly become personal health assistant centers.
Not to mention the sports aspect, the accuracy of recognition of complex sports is still a problem. Even though OPPO and Huawei claim that they have hundreds of sports programs, most of them are heart rate recording devices. "Soy Sauce Project" has no guidance or reference at all. Especially ball games.
The situation is even worse at the smart level. Except for Apple, the smart watch ecosystem is still a piece of cake. Can you imagine an iteration of a series of products a year after its release, with only dozens of apps added to the application ecosystem? ! Android (including Hongmeng) smart watches urgently need a manufacturer alliance ecosystem!
In terms of the breadth of smart wearables
It is not yet a system and is very rudimentary. Smartwatches/bracelets in smart wearables account for the majority of shipments, but are limited. Due to the uniqueness of the watch category, it is destined to not have great advantages in health monitoring and comfort.
In the future, the breadth of smart wearables can be expanded, such as smart clothing, smart glasses, smart headphones, and even smart underwear. Comprehensive health monitoring, intelligent linkage, sports assistance, etc.
Therefore, I am positive and optimistic about the prospects of the smart wearable market. Mobile phones may not disappear, but the combination of people and smart needs will not only be through mobile phones, but will include mobile phones, smart wearables and The perfect systematic combination of smart home.
#oppowatch2#
#HUAWEIWatch3#
#HUAWEI Hongmeng#
#OPPO#
# Smart Watch #
Guangyan
2021.11.14
The above content is original.
Reprinting without permission is prohibited.
The above content is all original.
Reprinting without permission is prohibited.