What are the scope of patent litigation?

Legal analysis: The scope of patent litigation is as follows: 1. Disputes over patent application rights; 2. Patent ownership dispute cases; 3. Cases of contract disputes over the transfer of patent rights and patent application rights; 4. Cases of patent infringement disputes; 5. Patent dispute cases of counterfeiting others.

Legal basis: Article 1 of Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Applicable Legal Issues in the Trial of Patent Dispute Cases.

The people's court accepts the following patent dispute cases:

(a) the patent application right ownership dispute cases;

(two) patent ownership dispute cases;

(3) Patent contract dispute cases;

(4) Cases of patent infringement disputes;

(five) patent dispute cases of counterfeiting others;

(6) Disputes over the use fee for the temporary protection period of the invention patent;

(7) Disputes over rewards and remuneration of the inventor or designer of a service invention-creation;

(8) Cases of disputes over the application for preservation of pre-litigation behavior;

(9) Cases of property preservation disputes before litigation;

(10) Disputes over liability for damages caused by application for preservation;

(eleven) cases of disputes over liability for damage caused by the application for property preservation;

(12) Disputes over the right of authorship of the inventor or designer of an invention-creation;

(thirteen) to confirm the dispute case of non-infringement of patent right;

(fourteen) the patent right is declared invalid after the return of fees dispute cases;

(15) Disputes over liability for damages in malicious patent litigation;

(sixteen) the necessary standard patent royalties dispute cases;

(seventeen) refuses to accept the decision of the State Council patent administration department to maintain the rejection of the application for re-examination;

(eighteen) refuses to accept the request for invalidation of the patent decided by the patent administrative department of the State Council;

(nineteen) cases that are not satisfied with the decision of the patent administrative department of the State Council to implement compulsory license;

(twenty) cases of refusing to accept the decision of the patent administrative department of the State Council on compulsory license fees;

(twenty-one) refuses to accept the administrative reconsideration decision of the patent administration department of the State Council;

(twenty-two) cases that refuse to accept other administrative decisions made by the patent administrative department of the State Council;

(twenty-three) cases that are not satisfied with the administrative decision of the department in charge of patent work;

(twenty-four) to confirm whether it belongs to the scope of patent protection;

(twenty-five) other patent dispute cases.