Let alone talking about other things, I just want to talk about one point. Liu Chuanzhi embezzled the Hanka and technology that Academician Ni Guangnan gave to the country for free. Then Liu Chuanzhi kicked Academician Ni out and monopolized it, allowing a 100-state-owned company to be converted into A holding company headed by Liu Chuanzhi. Then using academician Ni Guangnan's gift of Hanka and technology to the country to create huge wealth for himself and put it into his own pocket, is this method like embezzlement and misappropriation of national assets?
First of all, it is 100% fact that Lenovo caused the loss of state-owned assets. There is no need to dwell on it. The reasons for this problem are multifaceted. On the one hand, it is related to the restructuring of state-owned enterprises advocated by the policy at that time. On the other hand, He met the leader Liu who was good at speculation and the Chinese Academy of Sciences and other elites.
Secondly, in the case of Lenovo, the loss of state-owned assets is not the most painful thing. The most lamentable thing is the red leaders of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the green leaders of Lenovo. They only see wealth in their eyes. They gave up the original intention of establishing Lenovo and turned a company that represented the country's hope for technological development into a mess. The hateful thing about these people is not that they embezzle state-owned property, but that they limit the speed of national development with their selfish desires.
The Chinese Academy of Sciences holds shares in Lenovo 100. In the end, the company was restructured and its shares became smaller and smaller. Liu Chuanzhi is just a part-time worker at Lenovo and does not have any shares. Later, when the company was restructured, he held more and more shares. What's the reason for this? Did Liu Chuanzhi invest the coins in his own pocket? Or Liu Chuanzhi, as a senior executive of Lenovo, designed his own interests into the restructuring plan during Lenovo's restructuring. Get the dividends of corporate restructuring once and for all!
By changing one’s appearance and doing things left and right, it seems that huge profits can be obtained legally. How will the country identify it? We, the people, are eager to wait and see!
It is an obvious fact that Lenovo embezzled state-owned assets. The First Chinese Academy of Sciences began to give 20 to 1.3 million yuan, 500 square meters of land to 60,000 square meters of land and Lenovo technology property rights to academicians. The first designed bidding conditions and intended to convert 29% To an accomplice, in violation of the transfer agreement, and with an accomplice, the employee was transferred to Liu Chuanzhi personally. This is not embezzlement. Secondly, 35% of employee rights were transferred to an accomplice company. In fact, Liu Chuanzhi had the most. Thirdly, Yang Yuanqing borrowed 3.15 billion from the bank to himself. Buying 8% of the shares of the company under your authority is just a clear-cut example of corruption. Fourth Lenovo is 90% in debt and insolvent, and it also pays an annual salary of 170 million. Whose money is it for? Isn’t it the money owed to the bank and its suppliers? So audacious,
I believe the materials disclosed by Sima Nan, Zhang Jie and others, it is ironclad that Liu Chuanzhi and others of Lenovo Group have embezzled state-owned assets. The Chinese Academy of Sciences belongs to the state, and Liu Chuanzhi is its staff. Using the restructuring of state-owned enterprises to put part of the shares into his own pocket is not embezzlement of state-owned assets? After seven changes and eight changes, the matter of Ni Guangnan was no longer involved. How could Liu Chuanzhi still be a Communist Party member!
Correction, it was Lenovo’s senior executives who embezzled state-owned assets!
First of all, Liu Chuanzhi’s annual salary is 100 million. If he had the achievements and contributions of Qian Xuesen and Ren Zhengfei, his annual salary would be 1 billion, and ordinary people would not care. But unfortunately, Godfather Liu has been struggling all his life. Apart from wearing the "Emperor's New Clothes" on his body, his contribution to Chinese society is negative! They are just vampires lying on the Chinese government and people!
Secondly, the loss of state-owned assets is obvious. The money purchased by the Chinese government is also a national asset. Lenovo’s senior management has almost monopolized the Chinese government’s procurement in this area under the banner of national brand. How can there be no loss of state-owned assets? Moreover, a product that costs 2,000 to 3,000 yuan on the market is sold to the government for 94,000 yuan. Is this considered a loss of state assets?
I think Lenovo has embezzled state-owned assets, but I won’t say anything else because I have no evidence. From the perspective of tax payment, Huawei's profits and production value are twice that of Lenovo, but Huawei's national tax payment is nine times that of Lenovo. Is it a state-owned enterprise? But they do not admit that they are Chinese companies, but international companies, but they want China to support them. Their products are expensive in China but cheap in the United States. Isn't this embezzlement of national taxes and embezzlement of people's property a loss of state assets?
Liu would not admit it even if he knew it. The public security organs can determine it without argument.
Now the whole country is staring at Lenovo! From the relevant reports seen at this stage, it is certain that Lenovo has invaded state-owned assets and turned public into private! Relevant state departments should thoroughly investigate and punish severely! Our socialist country must not cultivate big capitalists!!!
You lend your friend 10,000 yuan to do business, he earns 100 million yuan, and returns you 30,000 yuan principal and interest, and the rest has nothing to do with you.
But if he goes around saying that this business is your business, he will make that 100 million by borrowing your name. This needs to be explained clearly. Give him his working fee, and the extra should be yours. Not giving? That is embezzlement!