After successfully applying for a patent, if the company offers a very high price and no one is willing to buy it, doesn't it mean that it can monopolize a certain technology?

It can be said that you have a "monopoly" on a certain technology to a certain extent, but when you see the "" I typed, you will know what this monopoly is.

Monopoly means that you have monopoly, but applying for a patent does not mean that you have monopoly on the technology. Technology crossover leads to patent crossover. At the same time, patent is a complex product that combines technology and law, so crossover is inevitable. In this way, although you have exclusive rights to the technology, it does not rule out that other people also have exclusive rights to part or related parts of the technology, making it difficult to achieve your monopoly.

Of course, if you can control all patents on the technology, you can monopolize the technology. Such a monopoly is inevitable, and there is no such thing as compulsory licensing of patents due to anti-monopoly in China. Even if it is a compulsory patent license, the rights and interests of the patentee must also be fully respected!