Pine pollen has many patented technologies, especially the wall-breaking technology, which is only mastered by two domestic enterprises. In fact, the crushing technology of pine pollen is very common, but after crushing, hundreds of active enzymes of pine pollen will fail, and at the same time, related biochemical reactions will be induced, resulting in a large loss of nutrients. As far as the two companies that control patented technology in China are concerned, nutrients have also been lost. Most of the 260 nutrients can retain 200 nutrients. Other products without core technology can only maintain 100 kinds of nutrition after loss.
Moreover, the quality of pine pollen depends on the effective components, the so-called pine pollen activity. Once its active ingredients are destroyed, a bag of 3g pine pollen is not as nutritious as a 50g egg.
And the price of an egg is 0.7- 1 yuan, so a bag of 3g pine pollen should also be below one yuan. The purchase price of raw pine pollen in 80 yuan is 1 kg, and the procurement cost of raw materials for 3g is 0.48 yuan, so the profit of selling one yuan is already quite a lot.
Compared with companies that master core technologies, it is different. Generally, a pack of 3g core technology products 7-8 yuan. This is the difference between them.
Why are they so different? Let me explain briefly.
Crushing technology, as long as there is a machine, can crush pine pollen, and the wall-breaking rate is not less than 90%. But in order to keep the nutrients as much as possible, it needs to be tested many times. What's the wind speed? At what point is the temperature controlled? How much can the breaking rate reach? How many nutrients can you keep?
To maintain the balance of these factors, we need to invest a lot of manpower, material resources, financial resources and time costs, and gradually find the best balance point between them, which is patented technology.
In a popular saying, it's easy to go from zero to 50, and it's even more difficult to go from 50 to 80, and from 80 to 100. This kind of cost is by no means affordable for small enterprises.