Introduction to the catalogue of patent disputes

The first part is a typical case 1. Mingshan Electric Power Co., Ltd. v. Weigel International Cooperation and Development Co., Ltd. and other patent licensing contract disputes: the patentee entrusts others to sign the patent licensing contract with full authority. Should the sole authority be responsible for the legal consequences in the process of patent technology implementation? 2. Chengdu Institute of Organic Chemistry, China Academy of Sciences v. Chengdu Zheng Da Electric Machinery Factory: Does it constitute infringement to implement a patented technical scheme that is exactly the same as other people's products? 3. Zhuanghe Fine Arts Printing Co., Ltd. v. Guanjiao Central Printing Factory: If the patent office changes the scope of patent protection during the trial, should it be determined whether it is infringing according to the new patent scope? 4. Song Zhi 'an v. Wuxi Boiler Factory No.1 Branch for patent infringement dispute: Does it constitute infringement if the subordinate patentee exploits his patent or permits others to exploit his patent without the permission of the basic patentee? 5. Hong Kong Yimei Metal Products Factory v. Patent Reexamination Board of China Patent Office for confirming the dispute over the invention patent right of "lazy pliers door". Question tip: How to judge whether an invention has outstanding substantive characteristics? 6. China Company v. Celebrity Brewery and other bottle label design patent infringement cases: How to determine the priority of patent use? How to determine the amount of patent infringement? 7. After Jiang Baiping v. Li Lei and other patent applications are published, before the patent right is granted, the payment of royalties and patent infringement cases suggest: How to determine the scope of "temporary protection" before the patent right is granted? 8. Keyuan Company v. Nanfang Company for patent infringement. The claim was rejected because the accused product did not cover all the necessary technical features of the patented product. Q: If a product covers all the necessary technical features of a patented product, can it be regarded as patent infringement? ..... Part II Applicable Laws [Laws, Regulations and Rules] [Judicial Interpretation]