The current situation is that central enterprises that do not focus on real estate business have all gone up? Wang Di? Those central enterprises engaged in real estate business will naturally not give up real estate business easily. No wonder, since 20 10, SASAC has proposed that all central enterprises whose main business is not real estate must withdraw from real estate development business. So far, most of the 78 central enterprises have not quit. He didn't quit, but played the leading role in the land wars everywhere. Recently, there have been more central enterprises? Grab it? More than half of it is gone? Wang Di? Title, worthy of the name? Diwangtou? . It is particularly noteworthy that the price of a considerable number of plots has been higher than the local real estate sales price.
Although central enterprises are also enterprises, they can also participate in the development and operation of the real estate market. The problem is that central enterprises bear the role of the pillar of the national economy and enjoy advantages that other ownership enterprises do not have in terms of resource allocation, funds and policies. Participating in land auction in this capacity will inevitably lead to some problems, such as insufficient fairness, inefficient use of resources, and adverse effects on the market. Among them, the competition mode regardless of cost and consequences will not only continue to blow up the real estate market bubble, but also bury financial security risks.
Under the circumstances that China's economy is facing severe downward pressure, its economic base is severely squeezed by virtual economy such as real estate, and its ability to resist risks and sustain development needs to be enhanced urgently, central enterprises should take on greater responsibilities, make more efforts, make more contributions and play more roles in the real industry, especially the manufacturing industry? King of manufacturing? 、? Wisdom makes the king? This role. Regrettably, except for high-speed rail, UHV, nuclear power and other fields that can compete with the international advanced level, most manufacturing central enterprises are far from the international advanced level.
At the just-concluded National Science and Technology Innovation Conference, President Ren of Huawei Group gave a speech on behalf of Huawei, revealing that in the past 10 years, Huawei's total investment exceeded 240 billion, and in the past year, half of the10 billion invested by Huawei was spent on technology research and development. According to the latest data released by the World Intellectual Property Organization, the number of international patent applications submitted to the organization reached a new record last year, reaching 2 1.8 million. The United States is still the country with the largest number of applications, while China has the fastest growth. Huawei technologies ranked first in the corporate world for the second consecutive year with 3,898 applications, becoming the global corporate world? Patent king? .
In contrast, the patent applications of several central enterprises together are not as good as those of a Huawei company. Do central enterprises have funds? Wang Di? Why can't we work hard on technological innovation and strive for an application? Patent king? And then what? What is the annual investment of central enterprises in technology research and development? This gap between central enterprises and Huawei has a very different impact on the economy. As far as the contribution to economic and social development is concerned, the patent king? With what? Wang Di? There is no comparability at all. A developing country like China needs an enterprise like Huawei more than an it company? Wang Di? Enterprise.
We do not deny that the real estate industry is also a part of the economy and needs to be developed. However, if central enterprises also focus on real estate development, while ignoring technological innovation and the core competitiveness of enterprises, where can the international competitiveness of China's economy start?
Ren said, Huawei has been able to achieve such achievements for 20 years? Insist on doing only one thing? , not affected by real estate profiteering. And frequently from central enterprises? Wang Di? And more than half of the central enterprises have real estate sectors. There is a considerable gap between central enterprises and physical manufacturing enterprises such as Huawei in terms of industrial positioning, development concept and undertaking corporate economic and social responsibilities.
According to SASAC's requirements, central enterprises must? Highlight the main business? Competing with central enterprises? Wang Di? It depends. What is this requirement? The check-out order is the same, and they also failed to form an effective constraint on central enterprises. This makes people wonder: where is the supervision of state-owned assets? Facing frequent central enterprises? Wang Di? Under the embarrassing situation, the relevant functional departments have to come up with some authority, and it is time to implement a truly severe assessment of central enterprises. At the same time, core indicators such as technology research and development, patents and brands are added to the assessment indicators. Perhaps, do central enterprises have to fight for it? Patent king? It's a little difficult, but at least don't be a pawn, right? Wang Di? At least more money should be spent on technology research and development.
patent