1. Finger Butler
As a domestic niche brand, Finger Butler has formed an extremely strong dominance when it appeared on the market. The addition of innovative functions has made it Cordless vacuum cleaners have reached a very good level. In addition, the quality of Finger Butler's own products is also very good.
2. Midea
As the industry benchmark for domestic home appliances, Midea can be said to be involved in all aspects of life. In the field of vacuum cleaners, Midea’s cost performance and performance are also very good. . There is a very good balance between suction power and battery life, and other advantages include intelligence, convenience, and easy operation.
3. Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner
The Mijia Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner K10 Pro has received more than 20,000 reviews on third-party platforms, with a favorable rating of 96%. It is an all-in-one washing and mopping machine equipped with an electronically controlled rotating suction and mopping brush that can complete two processes of vacuuming and mopping at one time, making cleaning more worry-free and labor-saving. At the same time, it also has a hair anti-tangle patent, which can automatically cut off tangled hair without dirtying your hands.
4. Puppy T11 Cyclone Rinse
Puppy T11 Cyclone Rinse has more than 20,000 reviews on the third-party platform, with a favorable rate of 96%. It is an all-in-one mite removal, suction and mopping machine. The body adopts a handheld vertical design and weighs only 1.48Kg. It is stress-free to hold and easy to operate. The key point is that the core of this product has a built-in puppy brushless motor M30, which can achieve 150AW strong suction power, an increase of 61% year-on-year, and supports two adjustable gears: standard and strong.
5. Panasonic
Ten years ago, Panasonic was at the top of the vacuum cleaner industry. In recent years, Panasonic has continued to introduce new products and has indeed made them lighter and easier to use. model was released, but the price has not improved much after multiple function upgrades, so it is still considered a cost-effective configuration.