01 Typical issues with low intellectual property scores
◆ Problem analysis: Although there are not many cases where intellectual property scores are very low, according to the analysis of results over the years, there are companies that " "Drinking hate" intellectual property rights. Since intellectual property rights play a core role in the application of high-tech enterprises, losing points for intellectual property rights will bring about a series of chain reactions. For example, R&D projects, high-tech products, etc. may not be recognized. Therefore, the number of intellectual property rights is relatively small. , The quality is low, and the possibility of successful application by high-tech enterprises is very slim.
So, when everyone knows the requirements for high-tech companies to declare intellectual property rights, why do they still lose points seriously?
First, the requirements at the regulatory level are not met. Case 1: A software company filled in 10 soft works, but used 6 of them in the last application, so points will be deducted. Although the restrictions on patents in the past three years have been lifted, Class II intellectual property rights can only be used once. Companies that are re-certified in 2021 must be prepared for intellectual property rights. Case 2: The company only has one invention, but during the review it is found that the right holder of this invention is not the applicant, and the invention has expired without paying the annual fee, so it will naturally receive 0 points. Case 3: The company name has changed, but the intellectual property rights have not gone through the change procedures. Even if there is a change notice from the industrial and commercial department, the intellectual property rights will not be recognized by experts, basically giving 0 points. Case 4: The intellectual property rights are owned by multiple companies. Company A used it to apply for high-tech enterprises, but did not obtain authorization from other companies, or companies A and B used it to apply for high-tech enterprises at the same time, and the intellectual property rights were also not recognized by experts. Most are 0 points.
Second, failure to meet technical requirements Case 1: The company has 6 soft works, which on the surface have met the basic requirements. However, during the expert review, two of the soft works were not technically satisfactory at all. differences, so only one of them was recognized, resulting in points deduction.
◆ Recommendation: Before applying for high-tech enterprises, enterprises must pay attention to the layout and management of intellectual property rights. In terms of intellectual property creation, they need to closely integrate the company’s R&D activities and related technologies to ensure the quantity and quality of intellectual property rights. If the quality can meet the basic requirements, more points will be obtained. Do not regard the minimum basic requirements or threshold requirements of intellectual property rights in the management method as the highest requirements for enterprise declaration.
Secondly, we must focus on independent intellectual property rights and make it clear that intellectual property rights obtained through transfers and other forms have very low scores and exclusive licenses are no longer recognized. In terms of intellectual property management, we must ensure that all intellectual property rights are owned. Everyone is a filing enterprise, and the intellectual property rights are still valid. To avoid unpaid annual fees and repeated use of intellectual property rights, if you own the intellectual property rights, you must obtain authorization from the owner of the property rights.
02 Typical Problems with Low Scores in the Transformation Ability of Scientific and Technological Achievements
◆ Problem Analysis: The problem of low scores in the transformation ability of scientific and technological achievements varies greatly in severity. After analysis, it was found that in a surprising number of cases, Among the failed companies, some had a conversion capability score of only 20 points, while the lowest score was only 0 points. For companies with a conversion ability of nearly 20 points, there are obviously other problems in failing to pass the certification. However, for companies that only get less than 10 points, the low conversion ability score is basically the main reason for their failure to pass the certification.
At present, there are two main reasons for the low scores of enterprises’ transformation capabilities:
First, they misunderstand the connotation and logic of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements. Some enterprises even misunderstand the connotation and logic of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements. The results and conversion results are reversed.
Second, there is a lack of materials and support for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements. The transformation of scientific and technological achievements has not only quantitative requirements, but also quality requirements. Simply piling up numbers is meaningless, only the transformation of scientific and technological achievements that can be recognized by review experts is valuable.
After reviewing the application materials of some enterprises with low ability to transform scientific and technological achievements, we found that some enterprises listed twenty or thirty transformation items on their scientific and technological achievements transformation summary table, but there was not a single supporting document in the application materials. It is found that there is not even the most basic corresponding patent, or there is proof material, but it obviously lacks sufficient proof strength. If the number of recognized transformations is small and low, the score will naturally be low.
◆ Suggestion: In the latest revised scoring rules for high-tech enterprise management methods, the total score for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements is still 30 points, but the requirements are higher, making it much more difficult for companies to obtain high scores. Although the requirement for Category A is that the average number of scientific and technological achievements transformed per year is at least 5, technical descriptive materials need to be provided.
For enterprises, they must first accurately grasp the new policies and new requirements for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, accurately understand the connotation and logical relationship of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, and use existing technologies and achievements as the basis for sorting out the process. The starting point is to take products and samples with technical content that have brought or are about to bring revenue as the starting point, find the corresponding relationship between these two points, and grasp the various principles that have always been effective in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements.
Secondly, it is necessary to sort out and collect the proof materials. The richer and more powerful the proof materials are, the higher the possibility of the transformation being recognized. It is necessary to ensure that the number of transformations meets the requirements and that each transformation is Be supported by sufficient and prepared supporting materials.
03 Typical issues with low management level scores
◆ Problem analysis: This scoring module best reflects the importance and sophistication of enterprises in the recognition of high-level enterprises. There are only a small number of companies that have failed in high-tech recognition just because of low scores in management capabilities. There are usually other loss points. However, some companies have ignored this problem, and failure cases rarely occur. For example, search on Baidu and copy and paste corporate management system documents. , even seemingly low-level errors such as not changing the company name.
The main reasons for the low score are the following two aspects: First, the integrity of the materials. If a document is missed or misplaced, or the documents are not required for declaration, They will all lose points.
Second, there are quality issues with the materials. Common ones include inconsistencies in the content, logical errors, or even other company names, falsification of industry, academia and research, etc. These problems are often fatal.
◆ Recommendation: As far as high-tech enterprise applications are concerned, in addition to improving the level of R&D management, companies also need to do at least the following: First, carefully study the application requirements and scoring details, and collect each scoring item of certification materials to ensure the integrity of the materials proving a high level of management.
Secondly, focus on integrating the collected materials, crafting them carefully, and constantly improving and enriching them to ensure the quality of the materials and lay a solid foundation for obtaining higher scores.
Finally, it is necessary to ensure that the management level module is logically consistent with other materials and cannot be inconsistent. In addition, it must be oriented by the actual situation of the enterprise and avoid materials with obvious problems.
04 Typical issues with low growth scores
◆ Problem analysis: Low growth scores are “natural disasters”. Many enterprises, especially re-identified high-tech enterprises, are in the process of identification because The market environment, corporate strategy adjustments, etc. have resulted in the financial part's growth score being 0 points. This situation means that other module companies can only deduct a maximum of 9 points.
If except for growth, the scores in other modules are not satisfactory, it is often a sure thing to fail. However, many times, the "reason for failure" derived from comprehensive analysis is just low growth. It is not persuasive enough. In other words, even if the company's growth score is zero, 20 points are deducted from the total score, and there are still 80 points. So where are the other 9 points deducted?
In fact, after expert analysis, we learned that in fact, during the review, experts for each module rarely give full marks when scoring. Even if the materials elsewhere are perfect, some points may be deducted. Not to mention that in most cases, it is difficult for the company to make the materials perfect. Those who have three or four points deducted are easy to detect by the company itself, and they will not know the specific reasons for the deducted points. However, The total adds up to 9 points, or even exceeds 9 points.
According to the analysis over the years, most of the companies that failed due to low growth scores were concentrated between 65-70 points. Looking at it from another perspective, that is to say, the reason for the failure of enterprises to be recognized as high-end enterprises is not because of low growth scores, but because other materials are not perfect.
◆ Suggestion: There is no other way to improve the growth score, that is, the company should strive to develop and expand, so that the financial data is conducive to the score, but this is not realistic in the short term or during the high-end enterprise declaration cycle.