The clarity of the graphics card is divided into four levels (A+ A B C).
A+: 1920* 1440 75Hz is still clear.
A:1600 *1200 85hz (UXGA) is still clear and suitable for 2 1"/22" CRT.
B: 1280*960 85Hz(SXGA) is still clear, and higher resolution will burn out, which is suitable for19 "CRT.
C: 1024*768 85Hz(XGA) is still clear, and higher resolution will burn out, which is suitable for17 "CRT. The screen used for testing is EIZO T965 or Mitsubishi 2070SB.
Note: EIZO and Mitsubishi are professional brands of 3dfx in medical display.
Creative voodoo banshee
A 1600* 1200 85Hz is very clear. Unfortunately, the bandwidth of RAMDAC is not enough to open the limited STB Voodoo 3 3000 with higher resolution.
The performance of UXGA has not been tested above B, so it may be better.
Antenna tuning inductance
BBA Xpert 128
A- UXGA is sharp, but there is a slight ghost on the right side of the word. BBA Xpert2000
A- performance is the same as Xpert 2000BBA AIW 128.
The word B UXGA is a bit empty, and the sharpness of strokes is a bit poor, which is lower than Xpert2000. BBA radium PCI
C SXGA 85Hz will burn, and UXGA won't use it at all. BBA· Redian 7000 EVC
A++ 2048* 1536 can turn on 85Hz, and the resolution of 75Hz is better than that of 400NVS BBA RadeonLE.
SXGA began to paste BBA radium dragon 8500LE.
UXGA definition input G400 gigabyte radium dragon 8500 64MB
B UXGA lost 400 NVS Hercules radeon 8500 128 MB.
1920* 1440 75Hz input 400NVS PowerColor radium dragon 9000Pro.
SXGA has smear, while UGXA still has smear at 60hz. Gigabit radium dragon 9200 64MB(R9264D)
The output of DSUB is quite clear. Gigabit radium dragon 9200128mb (R92128dh)
DSUB output ADDVI-A output C DSUB output UXGA is quite clear, and 1920* 1440 75Hz is obviously input to NVS200. Qiheng radeon 9550128 MB128 bit
C UXGA paste can't be used at all, but SXGA is still not very good, only 1 152*864 85Hz. BBA fire control T2-64
A bright white light band will appear on the right side of the text above B SXGA, similar to ghost Gigabyte Radium Dragon 9700P.
The clarity is more professional than RadeonLE BBA radium dragon 9700.
A- definition is better than RadeonLE, and SXGA and 200NVS BBA AIW9700Pro are neck and neck.
B UXGA has noise on the black background, and the font is slightly attached to ELSA 9800Pro.
A- UXGA font small virtual BBA radium dragon 9800XT
A- UXGA Font Small Virtual BBA Radium Dragon X800 Professional Edition
DSUB output ADDVI-A output B DSUB output UXGA clarity is great, the word is thin, and the word 1920* 1440 75Hz is a bit imaginary.
Matlock.
Millennium II
B RAMDAC bandwidth is not enough to open UXGA 32bit, SXGA color is green, but Sharp Millennium G400 SH 16MB MIT.
The water ripple of B 1600* 1200 is more obvious than that of G550. After RAMDAC overclocking to 350MHz, you can get a -Millennium G400 DH 32MB MII.
B UXGA water ripple is more obvious than G550, and the clarity of SXGA is also poor. Millennium G550.
A failed to detect 1920* 1440 75Hz, which may be Parhelia 5 12 AGP4X at A+ level.
A+ 2048* 1536 75Hz resolution is still good.
Compared with UXGA fonts, A font is a little empty, and the clarity of 1920* 1440 75Hz is obviously not as good as that of 200NVS.
NVIDIA
ELSA TNT2 PCI
B tested with MOZO S7 10, the higher resolution is unknown. Elsa TNT2M64
Even XGA can paste Elsa GF256.
C 1 152*864 85Hz font raw edge creativity GF256DDR.
B tested two, one of which was not bad when driving SXGA, and the other felt a little mushy (GV-GF 20 10D-64).
B UXGA is obviously burned, and SXGA can accept it. Elsa GF2GTS
The definition of C 1 152*864 is obviously not as good as that of G400' s Spectra 8400.
The resolution of A+ 1920* 1440 75Hz is better than 200NVS ELSA GF2MX.
Although there is no ghost in C XGA, its definition is obviously not as good as that of G400 Elsa GF2Ultra.
There is a ghost on the right side of the spectrum 8800 of Laonian in C XGA font.
A+ is neck and neck with SP8400 Gainward GF2Ti.
SXGA has some paste, gain GF3.
A This is the first generation GF3, and the resolution is quite good. Gainward GF3Ti200。
B~A- This is made of PCB of GF3, model 200T, and gain GF4Ti4200.
A- UXGA can still use Leadtek GF4Ti4200, although its definition is less than 200NVS.
A- SXGA is quite clear, but the spectrum WX25 of Laonian has not been properly tested.
The output of DSUB is quite sharp. WX25 font strokes are thin, NVS200 strokes are thick and black, but they are all sharp. Quadro 200NVS
A+ 1920* 1440 75Hz is still clear Quadro 400NVS.
A+ has the same definition as 200NVS, but the water ripple is more obvious than 200NVS MSI GFFX5600.
A- SXGA and 200NVS have similar definitions. Albatron GeForceFX 5950 Ultra (original card)
A UXGA is quite sharp and has the potential to get A+.
No. 9
3D revolution
C has a high brightness, but it will be burned above 1 152*864 85Hz.
PowerVR
Hercules Kyro 2 64MB
B RAMDAC clock is not enough, so it can only drive to UXGA 75Hz.
S3
Aisi Deltachrome S8
The clarity of A~A+ text is quite high, but it conflicts with SIS746/SIS748, and the complement of BBS text is also quite ugly, unlike NVIDIA, which can remedy it.
XGI
Vorali Duo V8 Ultra
B UXGA can barely be used, but the highest stacking resolution is only 1280* 1024, and it has obvious color gradation Vorali V8 Ultra.
C SXGA has been pasted, and the highest overlay resolution is only 1280* 1024. Summary: Matrox is similar to ATI in font supplement, but NVIDIA is inferior.
This is a unified driving relationship, so the evaluation is common to the whole family. The strength of NVS seems to be that the signal strength is relatively high, and it is not afraid that the output signal of matrox's patented ultra-sharp ramdac has changed ~
Although its output quality is excellent, the oscilloscope is not like this. QuadroFX500 first, G550 second.
The following figure shows the address of nvidia quadro series graphics card comparison table. You can refer to it if necessary.
/object/IO _ 1 176 1 . html