How to deal with the interrogation of case handlers

Interrogation is conducive to the detection of cases. The police questioned the suspect in order to know the specific circumstances of some cases. In real life, due to the uneven quality of case handlers, there may be illegal acts such as inducing confessions, which is not conducive to our innocence. So how to deal with the interrogation of the case-handling personnel and how to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests? Here are some ideas for everyone. First, consult a lawyer first. Before the public security organs find you, it is strongly recommended to go to a law firm and ask a professional lawyer to provide you with advice. If you can get advice from a senior lawyer in this link, the effect is very good. It should be noted that we do not recommend looking for a lawyer for free consultation. Nothing for nothing. Don't lose big because of small things. The legal profession is also a mixed bag. It is far more important to find a responsible and experienced person than to save money when encountering such troubles as criminal cases. Second, confess the facts of the case. If you go to the public security department, don't take any chances, just admit what you have done, which is also conducive to sentencing. However, you can properly explain why you want to do this. The important thing is that if you have excuses, you must make sure that they are written in the transcript, otherwise the excuses are meaningless. On the other hand, you must never admit what you have not done because of the inducement and threat of the police. Seek truth from facts. Third, interrogation is a process of psychological game. Most suspects are often isolated from the outside world when facing interrogation. Facing the police who represent the state power, they will appear psychologically fragile, uneasy, helpless, at a loss and even afraid. At this time, it is necessary to understand that according to the current law, the police can only detain you for 48 hours before obtaining conclusive evidence to prove your crime. If the police don't get conclusive evidence of your criminal behavior, then he can only let you go. However, if you were induced to confess and confessed according to the police's preset answers, then I'm sorry, the police have enough evidence to detain you. When the Notice of Criminal Detention is issued, most of you will only face a long detention and sentence. Moreover, even if they find out that they have caught you wrong in the future, they will be irresponsible, because they will say that you were arrested on the basis of your "confession" and that your own "confession" misled the police handling the case. You should bear the main responsibility. In this case, the dumb can only eat Rhizoma Coptidis. Fourth, don't trust the promise of the police. At this stage, I particularly emphasize that you should not believe the promises made by the police, such as "admit your crime and let you out." Such nonsense. Admit what you have done, but never blindly admit what you have not done. Don't expect to confess now, you can retract your confession in court later. In my experience, most judges usually turn a blind eye to irregularities in the trial process. As long as there is no conclusive evidence to hurt you, or the confession is obviously contradictory to other evidence, you can only get the judgment of "bad attitude of confession". When you testify against the police for inducing confession, the judge will usually ask you, what evidence do you have to prove? According to the lawyer's criminal work experience of more than ten years, it is basically impossible for a criminal suspect to prove that he has been lured into confession. Fifth, know a little about interrogation strategy. For the police, interrogation is a basic skill, and experienced old policemen know that the process of interrogation is the process of breaking the psychological defense of suspects. There are many skills in this. One of the more common is singing "Double Spring". The two policemen in the trial, one with a red face, one with a white face, one with a threat, one with comfort, one with a turn, and the other seems to have opened a "life" for you. Few parties can escape this hand, and even some parties are secretly tricked into admitting a crime they didn't do, but afterwards they are grateful to the person who made a pretence to comfort him, but they don't know that the person who comforted you and induced you may kill you in the future. Six, the transcript should clearly express their meaning. It is also quite learned about how to keep a report card. The same story, recorded in the suspect's language and recorded in the police's language, often gives people a completely different impression. I can't teach you how to play this word game in this essay, but there is one thing that the parties can easily do. Ask to record according to your narrative style and words, if you have any questions about the words and expressions he recorded. You can ask for supplement or rewriting, which is your right given by law. If the other party doesn't change, don't sign it and spend it. You are anxious. Maybe he is more anxious than you. In addition, before signing, you must read the transcript carefully. If they miss it or have any ambiguity, you can ask for something to add. Read it carefully and sign it if you mean it. At this time, some policemen may be bad-tempered, impatient and angry, but you must remember not to be influenced by their emotions. Read it carefully before signing. Because signing means your approval of the transcript, this statement is very important in the future trial. Of all the confessions, the first record is particularly important. In judicial practice, we are called "the king of confession". Because it is generally believed that the first time you make a record, the parties don't have much defensive meaning in their hearts, and the narrative can best reflect the situation of the case. Therefore, when the contents of several confessions are different, this first confession will receive special attention. Usually the first statement shall prevail. 7. Remember the content and time of your report card. I made several transcripts for myself, the time and content of each transcript. All parties concerned should try to remember. These details may be particularly important for future defense lawyers. In the process of criminal trial, it often happens that the files handed over to the court by the public security and procuratorate are not comprehensive. They will intentionally or unintentionally leave the evidence that is beneficial to the suspect and can prove that the suspect is innocent and guilty, while the evidence that is unfavorable to the suspect and can prove that the suspect is guilty will be transferred to the court for the judge to see. In this way, judges and lawyers may see incomplete evidence. Therefore, if the parties can remember the time and content of each transcript. It is more important for the defense lawyer to refute. Lawyers can ask the procuratorate to provide relevant evidence according to the clues provided by the suspect, so that the judge can comprehensively review the case. Instead of just passively responding to the prosecutor's allegations. To sum up, how do we deal with the interrogation of case handlers? We should have a clear understanding, tell the truth about what we have done, and never admit what the case handlers have not done. Only in this way can we better deal with the interrogation of case handlers, protect our legitimate rights and interests and safeguard our innocence.