Is it necessary to describe the nature of the crime and the main criminal facts that the defender has no objection to when making criminal defense in practice?

Simple description and explanation are always necessary, otherwise cutting into the defensive focus out of thin air will make people feel that "passive water has fallen from the sky." If everyone's attention is not mobilized, it will be less effective if we get to the point.

But I have no objection. Simply put, it is also convenient for listeners to quickly enter the defense focus. The words before entering the focus are too verbose, and the judge is annoyed, giving people the feeling that "this lawyer talks a lot." When the focus really arrives, the judge may be distracted.