Lawyers and police

There are few similarities and too many differences.

If we have to sum up the similarities, then: 1, all belong to legal practitioners, and all should know the law, abide by the law and act according to the law; 2. Although everyone should know the law and abide by it, there are many people in both industries who don't know the law, abide by the law and don't act according to the law; 3, all belong to the social service industry; 4. No matter how good a police lawyer is, it is easy to talk with money.

Different places: 1, although they all belong to the social service industry, the police are officials and lawyers are people; 2. Lawyers generally earn more money, while police generally earn less; 3. Newly hired policemen earn more, while newly trained lawyers earn less; 4. It doesn't matter if the police have the right to earn more money and the lawyers earn less; 5, the police rely on scaring people to eat, lawyers rely on fooling people to eat, but sometimes the police also fool people, and lawyers also scare people.

In fact, these summaries are all nonsense, and there are many policemen. For example, the work of household registration police and criminal police is not the same industry at all, and lawyers who do litigation and non-litigation are also worlds apart. How can they make it clear in a few words?