What do you mean by cross-examination opinions in criminal protest cases?

1. Cross-examination opinion refers to the opinion that the cross-examination subject is allowed by law to ask, identify, question, explain, explain, consult and refute all kinds of evidence provided by the parties in the course of litigation with the help of various evidence methods, so as to form a specific probative force for the judge's inner conviction. 2. Regarding cross-examination in criminal trials, Article 47 of China's Criminal Procedure Law stipulates: "The testimony of witnesses must be interrogated and cross-examined by the public prosecutor, the victim, the defendant and the defender in court, and the testimony of witnesses from all parties can be used as the basis for finalizing the case." In addition, in 1998, the Supreme People's Court adopted Article 58 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), which further stipulates: "Evidence must be verified by court investigation procedures such as court presentation, identification and cross-examination, otherwise it cannot be used as the basis for deciding a case." 3. China's criminal procedure law clearly stipulates that evidence must be publicly presented in court and cross-examined, which shows that cross-examination is a necessary procedure in criminal procedure legislation. However, judging from the current practice of criminal proceedings in China, the evidence presented by the public prosecutor is generally less subject to intense questioning and cross-examination, and the public prosecutor rarely asks high-quality questions about the evidence presented by the defense in court, and the cross-examination procedure has not played its due role.