Why is Li Gang's son only sentenced to six years? Is it a little less? I don't know much about law. I don't want to read the official explanation in the newspaper.

Question 1 Why not be convicted of "endangering public security by dangerous means"? In response to a question about why some people caused casualties by drunk driving constitute a crime of endangering public safety by dangerous means, while Li drunk driving caused death only for traffic accidents, the Wangdu County People's Court gave the following written reply: 1 Not all casualties caused by drunk driving are convicted of "endangering public safety by dangerous means", which means deliberately using dangerous methods other than arson, breaking water, explosion and throwing dangerous substances to endanger public safety; The crime of causing traffic accidents refers to the act of violating traffic management laws and regulations, causing serious injuries, deaths or heavy losses to public and private property. Drunk driving is a dangerous behavior that endangers public safety, but not all crimes that cause casualties due to drunk driving are convicted and punished according to the crime of endangering public safety in a dangerous way. 2. Li's crime is an overconfident mistake, and the evidence cannot prove that he has a hopeful or laissez-faire attitude towards the consequences. In 2009, the Supreme People's Court issued the Opinions on the Applicable Law of Drunk Driving Crime. That is, the perpetrator continued to drive after the accident, causing heavy casualties, indicating that the perpetrator subjectively left the consequences of persistent harm to himself and deliberately endangered public safety. If this kind of drunk driving causes heavy casualties, it should be convicted of' endangering public safety by dangerous means' according to law. "In this case, the defendant Li was drunk driving and violated traffic rules. When others kindly reminded him to drive slowly, he trusted his driving skills too much, saying that it was "nothing" and that credulity could avoid harmful consequences, which was an overconfident mistake. The existing evidence can't prove that Li is hopeful or laissez-faire about the result of his driving down the victim and Zhang Jingjing. After Li's accident, he didn't continue to drive away, regardless of the safety of other vehicles and pedestrians driving on the road, which caused more serious consequences. Therefore, Li's behavior does not conform to the above Opinions, which constitutes a crime of endangering public safety by dangerous means, and his behavior should be recognized as a traffic accident crime. Q 2: What is the sentencing basis for Li being sentenced to six years' imprisonment? The Wangdu County People's Court gave the following written reply to the question about the sentencing basis of Li's six-year imprisonment: first, the sentencing should comply with the legal provisions; second, it should comply with the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity; at the same time, it should consider the circumstances of lenient and heavier punishment for the defendant, and make a prudent and steady decision within the statutory sentencing range. Article 133 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that whoever escapes after a traffic accident shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years. Although Li's relatives actively compensated the victim's economic losses and obtained the victim's understanding, and they voluntarily pleaded guilty in court, they had a good attitude of repentance and the range of light punishment as appropriate, but Li drunk driving, speeding, and a traffic accident occurred on campus, resulting in 1 death and 1 injury, and escaped after the accident. The crime is bad and the consequences are serious, so it should be severely punished according to law. The court of first instance comprehensively considered the specific circumstances of the case and sentenced Li to 6 years in prison, with appropriate sentencing. ■ Test site >> The auditorium was packed. At 9: 00 am on 26th, the case of "1kloc-0/6" campus traffic accident of Hebei University was heard in public in the Fifth Trial Chamber of Wangdu County People's Court, designated by the judicial authorities of Baoding City, Hebei Province. The courtroom auditorium, which can accommodate 60 people, is packed. Observers include NPC resident representatives, CPPCC members, journalists, families of victims, families of defendants, representatives of teachers and students of Hebei University and some people. After the presiding judge announced the trial, Li was brought into the court by two bailiffs and sat in the dock in the center of the court. & gt& gt The prosecution took the crime of traffic accident as the public prosecution organ, and the Wangdu County People's Procuratorate sued Li for the crime of traffic accident, arguing that the defendant hit someone with a car in the living area of the new campus of Hebei University on the evening of June 65438+6 last year, resulting in 1 death and 1 injury. Later, the police decided that he was drunk driving, and he escaped after the accident and should bear all the responsibility for the accident. I hope that the court will sentence the defendant Li to three to seven years in prison for traffic accidents. The prosecutor who hit two girls after drinking and driving later presented several sets of evidence in court, including Li's personal record, witness testimony, Hebei University campus surveillance video and so on. Among them, Li's criminal facts of the day were restored: on the evening of June 65438+ 10 last year, Li invited friends to dinner in a hotel in Baoding and drank a lot of white wine. At that time, there were 9 people present. After dinner, Li drove his friends back to the living area of the new campus of Hebei University in a black Magotan car. When he drove to the front of a supermarket in the living area of the new campus of Hoda University, he knocked down two girls. The evidence provided by the prosecutor also showed that there was an obvious warning sign of "speed limit of five kilometers" at the scene of the incident, but Li ignored it at that time. & gt& gt The defendant claimed to be confused and pleaded guilty in court. Li argued in court that he was drunk and saw a figure in front of him, so he slammed the steering wheel and honked his horn, but he still didn't give way. After the incident, he continued driving. " Because I was blind and didn't know what happened. "When he drove back to the south gate of the living area of Heda New Campus, the door was closed and security guards and students intercepted him. Then get off the bus and be taken to the school guard room by the security guard. Li said in court that he had no objection to the prosecutor's speech and said, "I plead guilty. ">& gt Li's defense lawyer has no objection to the criminal facts and charges accused by the public prosecution agency, but hopes that the court can give a lighter sentence. According to the main reasons, Li's attitude towards pleading guilty is good. The transcript shows that he was very anxious after being taken to the school guard room by security guards: "Call 120 quickly, save people first, and I will bear all the responsibilities. "After the incident, Li and his family took the initiative to compensate the victim's family and reached a civil compensation agreement, which obtained the understanding of the victim's family.