A criminal case occurred in Anyang, Henan Province, resulting in 2 deaths 1 injuries. What is the specific process of this matter? At 7 pm on February 26th, a criminal case occurred in Wenfeng District, Anyang City, Henan Province. The police reported that the accident caused two deaths and one injury. The suspect Zhao was arrested by the public security organ on the spot and the case is under further investigation. According to the witnesses at the scene, the man may suffer from mental illness. He ran away from two places and hurt people in succession. When the police arrived, they managed to seize the murder weapon. If it is mental illness, it can only be diagnosed after identification. Because, judging from his suicide attempt, it may not be the performance of a mental patient. Of course, there is no identification, and it cannot be ruled out that he has mental disorders. But such a serious consequence, even if there are mental problems, can't just forget it. If there is mental illness, then the guardian should bear the responsibility.
What responsibility will the perpetrators bear? According to the provisions of China's criminal law, mental patients can only bear criminal responsibility according to law if they can't identify or control their own behavior and it is proved to be true through strict legal procedures. Mental patients who have not completely lost the ability to identify or control their own behavior should bear criminal responsibility after committing a crime, but they can be given a lighter or mitigated punishment according to law. Intermittent mental patients who commit crimes when they are mentally normal should bear criminal responsibility. Therefore, if the criminal suspect in this case is indeed a schizophrenic after identification, and he was in the onset period when he committed the crime, he could not identify or control his behavior, and he could not bear criminal responsibility according to law.
According to the case, if the suspect is not a mental patient, the possibility of immediate execution is almost 100%. From the analysis of the case, he committed a crime with a clear goal and a clear object, and he was able to commit suicide afterwards, indicating that his consciousness was sober and he should not be in a situation where he could not fully identify or control his behavior. Therefore, we should bear criminal responsibility. Of course, the final appraisal conclusion shall prevail.
(The picture comes from the Internet. If there is any infringement, please contact the author to delete it. )