If you had hired a lawyer, you could have won the case, but he lost.
A lawsuit I think I can win. In fact, it may not win. There is a saying: the plaintiff sues one, and the defendant should be killed. The defendant retired one, and there is no difference between the two sides. It means that when it comes to litigation, the public says that the public is right and the old woman says that the old woman is right, and each station has its own position and each says its own truth. Everyone thinks we can win this lawsuit. I think I can win the case, but I just look at the problem from my own standpoint. If you change your position and look at it from another angle, sometimes it will be very different. I feel I can win the case, but I often lose. This is a daily - happened thing.
If a lawyer makes a major mistake in representing a case and causes economic losses to the parties, the parties can not only refuse to pay the lawyer's fees, but also ask the lawyer to compensate for the economic losses. Lawyers and judges handle cases on the basis of facts and take the law as the criterion. The successful case was defeated by the lawyer, either because there was something wrong with the lawyer's trial evidence or because the lawyer made a major mistake in his speech at the trial, so as to remind the other party. The lawyer made a major mistake in testifying.
Will there be a charge?
If it is an ordinary agency contract, it is neither reasonable nor possible, because most lawsuits have already paid the fees when signing the contract, and the judgment shows that the lawyer's work has been completed. If it is a risk agent, it is agreed that the lawyer's fee will be drawn from the execution payment, so it is not necessary to give it if you can't get the money, because both parties agree that the lawyer's fee will be drawn from the execution payment and you don't have to pay the lawyer's fee if you can't get the money.