Life is a matter of life! We reported that Xiong, the High Court of Hebei Province, Ye Hongming, the Intermediate Court of Handan City, and others were suspected of accepting high bribes for inaction. No handling, no investigation, no reply. Said it was a duplicate report. Going against God's will, deceiving others and holding a group to keep warm are the umbrella behind inaction.
According to the provisions of Articles 55, 60 and 66 of the Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) on Public Security Administration Punishment and Article 188 of the Criminal Law. Whoever commits the crime of dereliction of duty, engages in malpractices for selfish ends, intentionally reverses black and white, perverts the law and judges, violates discipline and law, and violates the party discipline and state law, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years.
Notice of Reporting: 1: This website receives reports of duty crimes under the jurisdiction of procuratorial organs and violations of laws and regulations by procuratorial police officers as stipulated in the second paragraph of Article 18 of the Criminal Procedure Law.
The Supreme People's Procuratorate: Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Filing and Investigation of Judicial Personnel's Duty Crimes;
6. Article 397 of the Criminal Law is the crime of abuse of power and dereliction of duty.
8. Crime of bending the law for selfish ends in Article 399 of the Criminal Law.
Special report to the "Supreme Procuratorate": Xiong of Hebei High Court; Ye Hongming and Yang Guodong of Handan Intermediate People's Court were suspected of taking bribes, abusing their powers, neglecting their duties, practicing favoritism, harboring perjury and perverting the law. Should be investigated!
This is a case of alleged intentional homicide to defraud Liu Yanhong of three high-value insurances10.3 million, and the compensation amount is about10.9 million. Then conspire to create false identification and false evidence, deliberately frame and frame a particularly typical unjust, false and wrong case! Should be investigated!
The facts are as follows:
1, Ye Hongming of Handan Intermediate People's Court, in the trial of (20 16) No.43 at the beginning of Ji 04, the autopsy appraisal was false, and the original pathological report was never issued (suspected of reporting insurance). The contents of the two reports are based on each other, contradictory and full of loopholes, and the time has been pushed back by 24 days. The lawyer questioned, and the prosecutor said it was a clerical error, but he couldn't explain it! To add insult to injury, it is difficult to justify! There are many doubts and obvious fraud. In court, false appraisers and key witnesses are not allowed to cross-examine doubts in court, and Sun Hailong's statement is not accepted and not investigated. Before the trial, the lawyer submitted a written application to the court. During the trial, Sun Hailong asked for a re-appraisal of Liu Yanhong's body. Ye Hongming ignored it and didn't give any reply. Less than an hour after the trial, the prosecutor announced an adjournment and sentenced him to 12 years! Suspected of taking bribes! Should be investigated.
2. Sun Hailong refused to accept the appeal. Hebei Higher People's Court (20 16) No.457, the original judgment found the defendant Sun Hailong guilty of intentional injury. Some facts are unclear and the procedure is illegal. According to the provisions of Item (3) of Paragraph 1 of Article 225, Item (5) of Article 227 and Article 233 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the ruling is as follows:
1. Revoke the criminal judgment of Handan Intermediate People's Court (20 16) No.43 of Ji 04 Criminal Chu Zi;
Two, sent back to the Intermediate People's Court of Handan City for retrial.
3. Handan Intermediate People's Court rejected the case file sent back for retrial by Hebei Provincial High Court on the grounds that the facts were unclear and the procedure was illegal. At the end of the trial, the lawyer and the defendant must sign on blank paper! Decision (20 17) upheld the original judgment. 17 at the beginning of Ji 04. It's incredible! Should be investigated.
4. Sun Hailong appealed for the second time. Xiong of Hebei Provincial High Court refused to handle and pursue Sun Hailong's complaint, and asked the lawyer and the defendant to sign on a blank sheet of paper. The appraisal of Dafa University clearly stated "severe acidosis". Finally, it was declared that the evidence was insufficient, and the trial was adjourned. Without further trial, the original judgment was secretly upheld. Later, he made a fake trial CD for Sun Jumei, Wu Fulin, An Hailong and others to watch in Hebei High Court. There is nothing before the CD, and Sun Hong was finally sentenced. What's strange about this? Please check. Should be investigated!
5.201June 30, 2005 Forensic autopsy certificateNo.. 20 150 12 was issued by the physical evidence appraisal office of Fengfeng Mining Branch of Handan Public Security Bureau. On July 6, it was sent to Hebei Medical University, and on July 24, the forensic pathological examination report was issued by the forensic identification center of Hebei Medical University. On June 30th, the penultimate line of the second page of the Physical Evidence Appraisal Institute of Fengfeng Mining Branch of Handan Public Security Bureau (G (F) Jian (Autopsy) No.2015012). 4. Forensic pathological examination: pathological diagnosis: (For details, please refer to the report of the Forensic Pathological Examination of the Forensic Appraisal Center of Hebei Medical University, Ji Jian 20 15 No.204). How did you come to this conclusion? The License of Autopsy Appraisal Institution, the business scope of appraisal unit, the number of practicing certificate and the appraiser qualification certificates of Su Xiaofeng, Sun Jianbo and Liu Yu were not issued. The original report of forensic pathology of Hebei Medical University has never been produced, only the copy of the official seal of the Third Squadron of Criminal Police Brigade of Fengfeng Mining Branch of Handan Public Security Bureau is stamped on the upper right corner of the cover of the report of forensic pathology of Forensic Appraisal Center of Hebei Medical University. The lawyer raised a question. Prosecutor Lei Xianjun explained that it was a clerical error, and the explanation handed in was August 30th. So how to explain the three copies sent to Hebei Medical University on July 6th? The contents of the two reports are based on each other, contradictory and full of loopholes. Time has been reversed for 24 days, and it is getting darker and darker. It is hard to justify it! There are many doubts and obvious fraud. Fake appraisers and key witnesses are not allowed to cross-examine doubts in court every time. Life is a matter of life! Is it a word "clerical error"? The clerical error can be solved without explanation! Suspected of high bribery! You know, God has eyes! If you go against God's will, frame innocent people and ignore human life, heaven and earth will not tolerate it, and you will be condemned by God!
6. This is a typical case of suspected intentional homicide, defrauding three high-value insurances, and then framing others' unjust, false and wrong cases. Liu Yanhong has three high-value insurances with an insurance salesman named Li Jun in Fengfeng, and the compensation amount is about 1.9 million. The original informant (suspected to have been insured) then made false identification and false evidence to frame Sun Hailong. We reported the case in Pengcheng Third Squadron. Before Yang Guodong's trial, the lawyer applied to Handan Intermediate Court for investigation, but so far there has been no reply. Please check.
7. The testimony I wrote in the judgment was forged. None of the mobile phone numbers on it is mine. We are not allowed to cross-examine in court every time. Xiong, the High Court of Hebei Province, held a session in the Intermediate Court of Handan City. When several witnesses went to the Handan Intermediate People's Court, their requests for cross-examination in court were rejected again. Please check.
8. Liu Yanhong was hospitalized 17 days, and the hospital didn't have a single examination. I didn't have diabetes before my death, but I used a large dose of insulin on June 65, 438+02, 65, 438+0200, 65, 438+06, 400, 265, 438+0800, which led to hunger, coma, respiratory and circulatory failure, tremor, bullous chest and multiple organ failure in Liu Yanhong. The hospital spends about 5,000 yuan on Liu Yanhong every day. Why did severe acidosis occur in hospitalization 17 days? Why not investigate and find out the truth? Ask them how much dirty money they took from the hospital. Please find an expert to verify.
9. Previously, Dr. Tian Li invited Liu Yanhong to eat rice, but later, Dr. Zhang Wenqin refused to eat rice, and she also asked Liu Yanhong to take it back. It is said that she can eat three meals a day, and the hospital can completely nourish the diet. Finally, the autopsy stomach was empty! It's incredible! There were five people delivering meals in the hospital at that time. Please check.
10, Liu Yanhong was admitted to the hospital 17 days, and the hospital refused to do the examination. Say: you can't take the exam, you will die halfway! Without scientific basis, how to give Liu Yanhong medicine? What is the effective treatment for Liu Yanhong? The doctor insisted that it was brain damage! Why should I decide? Life is a matter of life! Is it inferred by human eye observation? It was deliberately framed and should be investigated!
1 1. On the platform between the third floor and the second floor of Liu Yanhong, the police investigated a small amount of blood and identified it as not human blood. June 2065438+June 2005, 1 1 is a new building. I've only been in a few families. What is the blood where Liu Yanhong fell? It is deliberately framed! Please check.
12, doctor Aring Zhang made a false certificate of Liu Yanhong's brain fracture. No skull fracture was found after autopsy. This is deliberately framed, please verify and investigate!
13. We asked people from Beijing Tongren Hospital to find an expert to consult Liu Yanhong. We asked the hospital for medical records, but the hospital wouldn't give them to us. Later, we were asked to copy all the tests and send them to Beijing. The doctor at Tongren Hospital said that if there is no medical record, how can an expert consult? Which department should an expert consult? No medical records, no experts. Please check.
14, we asked Liu Yanhong to be transferred to Shijiazhuang hospital, but the hospital refused to transfer, and threatened that we could not transfer, and the person died halfway. Please check.
15, the police changed all the locks of Sun Hailong's house and basement, saying that it was to protect the scene, but gave the keys to someone who was not in the public security bureau for safekeeping, and they could go in and out several times at will, and finally looted all the things in the room and basement! It's so lawless! Please chase!
16, court appraisal. During the trial, the defense lawyer pointed out that the opinions did not provide the practice certificates of Zhang Haidong and Yu Tianshui. The prosecutor provided by telephone in court that Zhang Haidong 1 10006098006 is a copy of the number of the medical practitioner, and Yu Tianshui 1 10006098053 is a copy of the number of the medical practitioner, not the judicial appraisers Zhang Haidong and Yu Tianshui, who are not qualified for the appraisal; The license of the judicial authentication institution of the court and the business scope of the unit are not provided. This is not a reappraisal of Liu Yanhong's body. Is based on the above two without scientific basis; Fake and shoddy appraisal materials and medical records based on Liu Yanhong's hospitalization 17 days, without ct examination and effective treatment plan, the procedure violates the provisions of Article 5, paragraph 4, of the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC)'s Decision on the Administration of Judicial Appraisal in Guantian: each judicial appraisal business must have more than three appraisers.
Please ask the relevant leaders to obey God's will and do justice for heaven! Maintain social stability! Find out the truth according to law and take facts as the basis; Take the law as the criterion. Violation of discipline and law based on its inaction. Investigate criminal responsibility according to law! Make it public, make it public! To show the dignity of the law!