2. Patients who need to continue treatment, rehabilitation and regular follow-up after discharge are within the scope of follow-up.
3. Follow-up methods include telephone follow-up, consultation, on-site follow-up and letter contact.
4. The follow-up time should depend on the patient's condition and treatment needs. Patients with severe side effects, complicated condition and critical condition should be followed up at any time after discharge.
5. During the patient's hospitalization, the medical staff responsible for follow-up shall be the responsibility of the relevant department directors, head nurses and competent physicians. The first responsible person is the competent physician, and the follow-up information is filled in the follow-up record part of the inpatient information file by the competent physician as required. And according to the follow-up situation, decide whether to follow up with superior doctors and department directors.
6. The director should check at least once a month to be responsible for the follow-up of discharged patients of residents. Medical staff who are not followed up as required should be urged.
7. The medical department and nursing department should regularly check and guide the information registration and follow-up of discharged patients in various clinical departments, and report the inspection to the business dean and inform the whole hospital.
8. Require the electronic filing rate of information registration of discharged patients in clinical departments to reach 100%.
Legal basis: Regulations on the Administration of Medical Institutions
Article 41 The state practices the accreditation system of medical institutions, and the accreditation committee composed of experts comprehensively evaluates the practice activities and medical service quality of medical institutions according to the accreditation methods and standards of medical institutions.
The evaluation methods and standards of medical institutions shall be formulated by the administrative department of health of the State Council.
Forty-second health administrative departments of local people's governments at or above the county level shall be responsible for organizing the evaluation committees of medical institutions within their respective administrative areas.
The review committee of medical institutions is composed of experts in hospital management, medical education, medical treatment, medical technology, nursing and finance. Members of the review committee shall be appointed by the health administrative department of the local people's government at or above the county level.
Forty-third health administrative departments of local people's governments at or above the county level shall, according to the evaluation opinions of the evaluation committee, issue accreditation certificates to medical institutions that meet the evaluation standards; For medical institutions that fail to meet the evaluation standards, put forward treatment opinions.