Recently, a municipal finance bureau announced the results of the complaint handling of the "comprehensive management of smart and civilized communities" project in the early stage of the Data Resources Administration. Why did this project come to this stage? What is the final result? For these questions, the operator financial network will answer them one by one.
The bid price of China Mobile with a budget of 2.8 million yuan is only 1/4.
It is reported that the data resource management bureau of this city just released the tender announcement of "Integrated Management Project of a Smart and Civilized Community in a Community" on April 18, with a budget of 2.8 million yuan.
There are four enterprises * * * that have come to bid, namely Zhong Tongfu Hexin Technology Co., Ltd., Anhui Shuxin Information Technology Development Co., Ltd. under China Telecom and China Mobile Provincial Company. It seems that the competitive environment is not particularly fierce.
Among them, China Mobile Company offered the lowest price, only 720,000 yuan; Among the comprehensive scores of the candidates, China Mobile Company got the highest score of 86.6.
In the end, the trustworthy China Mobile Company did win the bid and got the project.
China Telecom's subsidiary scored high, and finally initiated a complaint.
In the bidding process, the quotation of China Telecom's subsidiary is 2.679 million yuan, which is not the highest, and its comprehensive score is 85.09 points, which is the same as that of China Mobile Company.
Perhaps it is for this reason that the subsidiaries of China Telecom are dissatisfied with this result. After the query fails, the intelligent complaint will be made to the tendering units, agencies and successful suppliers.
China Telecom's subsidiary said that the performance contract of "XXL project in a county" provided by the first winning bidder could not reflect that it was an information platform construction project, and some performance materials provided by the company had objections; Request the financial department to cancel the qualification of the first successful bidder and re-determine the winning bidder from the remaining qualified bidders.
Interestingly, I don't know why the subsidiary of China Telecom actually knows the performance case provided by China Mobile, but it can also be determined that there is something wrong with this performance case. Does China Telecom's subsidiary have inside information?
The complaint was not established after investigation and evidence collection.
The Municipal Finance Bureau, after collecting the video surveillance of the bid opening site of the "Comprehensive Management of Smart and Civilized Communities" project from the respondent, and organizing relevant units to conduct investigation, evidence collection and evaluation, decided that the complaint of China Telecom's subsidiary lacked factual basis and the complaint was unfounded on the basis of argumentation and investigation by the expert group again, and rejected the complaint.
Finally, the result of winning the lowest bid by China Mobile has not been changed.
But how much money can be earned at such a low price is unknown.