I have a little contact with this company. After actual negotiation and online investigation, I found that this company is full of doubts and is not a reliable investment company. Summarize a few points for your reference:
1. Chad: sad reminder.
According to the online inquiry, under the same enterprise registration number (1105007521241), the predecessor of this company is Beijing Haohaixin Road Technology Co., Ltd., with a registered capital of 300,000 yuan, and its legal representative is Yu Feng. According to the query on Beijing Enterprise Information Online, Yu Feng is the legal representative of two information consulting companies, one of which has been revoked (note that it is not cancelled), and the registered capital of both companies is 654.38+10,000 yuan. As for how CIC Tiancheng became an investment company with a registered capital of 30 million by borrowing Haohaixin Road Technology, the reason is unknown, but such a starting point makes people feel guilty.
2. Marketing method: shanzhai.
Different from other investment companies' dress-up marketing methods, this company's external marketing and publicity methods are very fake, and it does not have its own website. Instead, it publishes advertising information on the websites of various platforms. The contents are only a few, which are large and comprehensive, and vague, unlike "CIC Tiancheng (Beijing) Investment Co., Ltd. is the investment and financing cooperation platform company of CIC Tiancheng Investment Group Co., Ltd. in China". Do you think this sentence is awkward? This is the first sentence of their company profile (printed version), and there are many other ill sentences, so I won't list them one by one. Excuse me, does this look like something done by a professional investment company?
3. Place of investment: Ren Lei.
Look at their explanation. In addition to not investing in the IT field, other traditional industries including "electronic building materials, textiles and clothing ... biochemical environmental protection ... logistics and other warehousing ..." are all involved. In addition to the strange statement of industry classification, the concern about some sunset industries is quite different from that of professional investment institutions, and they can only be given a "shocking" sentence.
4. Interview: Happiness comes too fast.
The company's external image is well packaged, but the interview is simple and direct, without feelings and professionalism. The basic statement of the investment manager is "good project, investment, project mortgage, report and due diligence". Experienced entrepreneurs will feel too happy to believe that inexperienced people will feel as if they have seen the other side of success. Careful analysis, in addition to the common truth that there is no pie in the sky, there are many doubts such as unprofessional discussion, avoiding problems and rushing to make decisions, which makes people feel psychologically drummed.
5. Public opinion observation: There are too many bad comments on the Internet.
A simple online search shows that there are many bad comments on the Internet, all of which are talking about how to cheat by exaggerating expenses in the name of due diligence. There is no smoke without fire, there is no reason, and netizens will not post complaints for no reason. In this regard, the explanations of "peer slander" and "malicious extortion" are pale and powerless. Imagine that there are so many investment projects invested by other investment companies, why are there no such bad reviews?
6. Ask the insider: I don't know.
Ask friends in the investment circle and they all say they don't know. Its mysterious background and low popularity do not mean its vigorous investment style.
In summary, do you still think it is reliable? If entrepreneurs can keep their eyes open, take no shortcuts and have a stable mind, I think they will not be so gullible.