First of all, let's be clear. Luo Yonghao didn't shy away from the problem of mobile phones. The reason for arguing with Wang Ziru is that Wang Ziru deliberately hacked, even after receiving money.
In the debate with Wang Ziru, Luo Yonghao's logic was rigorous and clear, and he advanced at different levels. He first pointed out some small factual errors in Wang Ziru's evaluation, so that the audience could understand that Wang Ziru could not even distinguish some basic facts, and then he introduced Wang Ziru's deliberate hacking, that is, the angle of the mobile phone.
In addition, Wang Ming accepted the money from the hammer for free in the cost consultation, but deliberately concealed the problems found in the evaluation. The consulting report to Hammer said that no problems were found, but after the release of Hammer's mobile phone, he immediately launched a video saying that various problems were even deliberately hacked, which was more hateful than the second point.
Finally, directly from the root, to destroy Wang Ziru, don't you flaunt yourself as an independent and objective third party? Then I will prove that you are neither independent nor a third party. You are kept by the manufacturer, and the accessories used in your mobile phone maintenance project are all black goods of unknown origin. This directly cut off Wang Ziru's wealth from the root.
If we don't talk about the problem of the hammer mobile phone (Luo Yonghao didn't hide or avoid the problem of the mobile phone), Mr. Luo always hangs Wang Ziru, especially after reading the evaluation of Samsung flog in Wang Ziru, and he is disgusted with that shameless licking screen. He can't recover without watching the debate again.