My daughter is only a little over nine years old. How does the anchor induce children to brush more than 7 thousand gifts to get them back?

According to the law of our country, the contract concluded between a person without civil capacity and a person with limited civil capacity is invalid. People without civil capacity refer to infants, mental patients, Alzheimer's patients and other people without civil capacity, and the contracts concluded by such people are completely invalid. People with limited abilities are slightly different.

According to Article 47 of the Contract Law, a contract concluded by a person with limited capacity for civil conduct is valid after ratification by the legal representative, but a purely beneficial contract or a contract that is suitable for his age, intelligence and mental health may not be ratified by the legal representative. The other party may urge the legal representative to ratify it within one month. If the legal representative fails to express it, it shall be deemed as refusal to ratify it. Before the contract is ratified, the bona fide counterpart has the right to cancel the contract. Revocation shall be made by notice.

Article 12 of the General Principles of Civil Law: Minors over the age of eight are persons with limited capacity for civil conduct and may engage in civil activities appropriate to their age and intelligence; Other civil activities shall be represented by their legal representatives or with the consent of their legal representatives.

Minors under the age of eight are persons without civil capacity, and their legal representatives act as agents in civil activities.

According to the above provisions, it is certain that if a person with limited capacity for civil conduct signs a contract that is not suitable for his age, intelligence and mental health, and has not been ratified by his legal representative, the contract is invalid. A child of 10 years old sends thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars to the anchor, which is obviously inconsistent with his intelligence. The money should be refunded. However, the reality is troublesome. If parents want to get their money back, they must prove that the act of brushing gifts is the child's own operation. This is very troublesome. Even if the parents can prove that the child is operating by himself, because the parents themselves have not fulfilled the guardianship responsibility of the guardian, they will judge that the parents themselves bear part of the responsibility, that is to say, it is impossible to return all the money. Therefore, although the live broadcast is good-looking, don't be fascinated. Remind parents and friends to take care of their mobile phones and pay passwords so as not to cause unnecessary losses to themselves.