Archaeological facts clearly show that Xiang Yu did not burn Epang Palace. I watched this program with tears in my eyes. )
Li Yufang, a researcher at the Institute of Archaeology of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and head of the archaeological research group of Epang Palace, said that through archaeological discovery, Xiang Yu burned the building of Xianyang Palace in Qin Dynasty, not the front hall of Epang Palace! ""According to the archaeological data of the excavation site, the fact that it didn't burn is already here. "
We drilled more than 200,000 square meters of wells in Qian Dian, and drilled five boreholes in one square meter of land. When drilling holes on the rammed soil surface of the original abutment, no traces of braised soil were found, indicating that this site in Qian Dian has never been burned by Xiang Yu! "Zhang Jianfeng, a member of the Epang Palace archaeological team and a graduate student of Shandong University who participated in the archaeological excavation of Han Chang 'an City and Qin Xingle Palace (renamed Changle Palace after the expansion of the Han Dynasty) with Li Yufang, said that within 36 square kilometers of the site of Han Chang 'an City, which was 200 years later than Epang Palace, the excavation was full of scorched earth and black dust, and some remaining column holes all turned into charcoal; The excavation of Changle Palace in the city found that the stew soil was very thick. This was burned by the peasant uprising army in the Western Han Dynasty.
Li Yufang said: "I can say for sure that we didn't find any braised soil in the ruins of the front hall of Epang Palace, nor did we find a tile ruin in the Qin Dynasty, nor did we find the accumulation layer of collapsed buildings in the Qin Dynasty, only the cultural accumulation layer in the Han Dynasty. Recently, we dug two new pits and found well-preserved cultural accumulation layers in the Tang Dynasty and beyond on the platform of the Han Dynasty, indicating that there are no buildings in the Qin Dynasty on the platform of this Qian Dian site. " She told reporters that Xiang Yu's "burning Qin Gong" recorded in the historical records was immortal in March, and the "Qin Gong" here should refer to "Qin building palace", which is a large scope. What part of Xiang Yu's "Qin Gong" burned in those days can only be explained by the facts of archaeological work.
No one who has visited the excavation site and understood my archaeological excavation and research level has raised any objection to the excavation results of Qian Wei. Everyone who opposes this believes in Du Mu's poem "Epang Palace Fu"! Facts speak plainer than words. Those experts and scholars who think that Xiang Yu has set fire to Qian Dian or Epang Palace had better come to visit the site. We sincerely welcome them. "Li Yufang said.
Researcher Li Yufang hopes to use this newspaper to solemnly correct some wrong reports in the media: First, the sentence "Who will feed, throw away the braised soil, and then pile up the" floating soil "with a height of 1 m" is incorrect; Second, "many experts think that she said that Epang Palace was not burned too hastily, and things have spread to National Cultural Heritage Administration, asking her to write a report". She said that National Cultural Heritage Administration didn't ask her to write a report recently, but the Provincial Cultural Relics Bureau asked Xi 'an Archaeological Institute to report on the trial excavation in the past year; Third, Liu Qingzhu, director of the Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said, "If a palace is built, all the treasures will be looted, but how can a broken bowl disappear?" Wrong, she thinks, this is because the reporter mistook "not even a tile" for "a bowl piece" because of the different accents between North and South.