How to correctly guide the masses to participate in the open work of police affairs

The publicity of police affairs is a basic system that public security organs and people's police disclose matters related to police affairs to the public or specific parties in a certain form according to law, so that the public can effectively participate in police affairs, supervise police rights and ensure fair law enforcement. With the implementation of this system, the open work of police affairs is increasingly showing great vitality and being welcomed by the people. However, due to the particularity of public policing, the initiative of this work is more in the public.

In the hands of the security organs. Under the new situation, how to guide the people to participate in the open work of police affairs in an orderly manner and further promote the development of public security work and team building is an important issue that public security organs at all levels seriously consider and solve.

First, the great significance of people's participation in the openness of police affairs.

(a) to promote the clean, standardized and efficient operation of public security organs. Judging from the principle of modern administration, the operation of undisclosed power is easy to lose supervision and will inevitably lead to corruption. If the public policing work lacks the people's due response and strong external pressure, the supervision of the public security organs themselves will gradually weaken, which is not conducive to fundamentally curbing and eliminating some negative corruption phenomena in the public security organs and the people's police, and is not conducive to the sustainable development of public policing work. People's participation in public policing is equivalent to putting public security work under public supervision, which can strengthen the police's sense of responsibility and promote the police to continuously improve their legal level and professional ability. At the same time, the public security organs are urged to make the police force public, so as to promote honesty and efficiency through publicity and fairness and justice through publicity, so that the public security organs can better serve the society and the public.

(2) It can satisfy the public's right to know and improve the transparency of the work of public security organs. People's participation in public policing activities is an important embodiment of the implementation of citizens, legal persons and other social organizations' right to know and their status as masters in related affairs in modern democratic politics. The establishment and implementation of the open police system is conducive to promoting the benign interaction between the people, the public security organs and the people's police: on the one hand, the people can fully express their wishes, including suggestions and criticisms, by participating in police activities and through their own thinking and practice, thus providing a good social foundation and human resources for the development of public security organs; On the other hand, people's understanding, cooperation, support and supervision of police work can encourage public security organs and people's police to continuously expand the breadth and depth of police openness, thus further increasing the transparency of police work.

(3) It can improve the relationship between the police and the people and establish a good image of the public security organs. Objectively speaking, in the open work of police affairs, the masses are passive recipients to a greater extent. Only by broadening channels and taking various measures to facilitate the people and benefit the people can the public security organs and the police be more conducive to narrowing the distance between the police and the people and increasing the people's trust in the public security organs and the police. By participating in public policing, the people can understand the basic standards and operational procedures of public security organs, improve their awareness of democracy and legal system, and stimulate their enthusiasm for participating in public security management, thus effectively resolving many complaints and misunderstandings about public security forces, enhancing their trust and dependence on public security organs, and maintaining the overall image of the people's police.

Second, the problems existing in guiding the masses to participate in the public policing work.

(1) Some policemen's cognitive biases and misconceptions reduce the effectiveness of police publicity. Some policemen, especially some leaders, have not fully realized the great theoretical and practical significance of police openness. Some people think that the more open the measures and systems of public security organs are, the easier it is to give people a handle and bind themselves, which may have a bad political impact on public security organs or public security police; Some people think that if police affairs are made public, it may have a negative impact on some charges of public security organs and affect the economic income of departments or individuals; Some people can't grasp the relationship between openness and confidentiality, and artificially expand the scope of confidentiality. In addition, some policemen's own quality needs to be improved, their purpose concept is weak, their professional level can't meet the needs of their work, and they have the idea of not wanting to be public, which reduces the effectiveness of police publicity activities.

(2) Public policing in some units is superficial, which is not conducive to giving full play to the supervisory role of the people. Openness, truthfulness and profundity are the three levels of police openness. Faced with this new working mechanism, some units do not actively and creatively carry out their work, but stay at a shallow level, showing randomness and fragmentation in the scope and content of publicity. Generally speaking, window services are more open, and in-depth law enforcement activities are even less open; The management department is more open, and the case handling department is even less open; Grassroots units are more open, and higher authorities are even less open; There are many open procedures and standards, but few open results; The obligations of the masses are much more open, and the rights of the masses are less open, and so on. Such publicity has led to the prevalence of pragmatism and formalism, narrowed the scope and reduced the transparency of police publicity, which is not conducive to eliminating corruption in public security organs and the people's police, and is also not conducive to the supervisory role of the people.

(3) The single and backward way of policing publicity makes people have insufficient understanding of policing publicity. The publicity of police affairs is a long-term process, not a phased movement, which needs to be publicized to the whole society through various forms for a long time. At present, the means of police publicity are mostly limited to printing pamphlets, making publicity columns, issuing notices and announcements, and the scope of publicity is mostly limited to some windows of public security organs. If the public needs to obtain police information, they often need to go to these windows, which is not conducive to the efficiency of police propaganda. Even though the concept of online policing and the means of online publicity are emphasized, the information on the Internet is either slow to update, short in time, narrow in content and arbitrary, which leads the people to still not understand the procedures and related disciplines of the public security organs, and it is still "trusting relationships and finding acquaintances" to do things in the public security organs.

(D) The public security organs' insufficient supervision and restriction on the openness of police affairs has reduced the people's enthusiasm for participation. In terms of external supervision, although most units accept the opinions, suggestions, reports and complaints of the masses by establishing a public appraisal system for police work, publishing the telephone number of reports, setting up a report mailbox, and opening the police camp, the suggestions and opinions are adopted.

Whether it is decided by the public security organs is easy to become a mere formality. In terms of internal supervision, the higher authorities are required to inspect and guide the police affairs disclosure of the lower authorities, and the functional departments of discipline inspection, supervision, supervision, political work, legal system and other organs at all levels are required to inspect the police affairs disclosure. However, the results of this internal supervision are mostly handled internally, and the masses know little about it. If the wishes and demands of the people are not clearly answered, and the supervision can't see obvious results, it will easily reduce the enthusiasm of the people to participate in the openness of police affairs and reduce their trust and satisfaction with public security organs.

Three, some suggestions to guide the people to participate in the open work of police affairs in an orderly manner.

(a) to further improve public awareness of the police. Every policeman should strengthen the awareness of police propaganda, so that the police can realize that police propaganda is their own job, not an extra burden. Every policeman should faithfully fulfill the requirements of police openness and always be ready to accept the supervision of people from all walks of life. Through targeted law enforcement education for the people, centralized training, on-the-job training and other forms, we should carry out ideological education and quality education for the police in a planned, step-by-step and persistent manner to change the uneven quality of the police in the current ranks. We should conscientiously implement various measures for the openness of police affairs, open the door to counseling, let the police go deep into the community and the masses, report their work, accept comments and listen to opinions, let the police reflect on themselves with the mirror of public opinion, and lay a solid ideological foundation for the openness of police affairs.

(2) Constantly expand the breadth and depth of police openness. The scope of police publicity can not be limited to solving the problem of facilitating the masses to handle affairs, but should, in accordance with the requirements of police publicity, publicize all links that involve the interests of the masses, are easy to abuse power for personal gain, breed corruption and undermine the principle of justice, except those that cannot be disclosed according to laws and regulations. Not only the functions and powers of the public security organs and the police should be made public, but also important decisions made by the public security organs involving the interests of the masses should be made public; It is necessary to disclose not only the basis and results of law enforcement, but also the law enforcement process and supervision measures; Not only administrative law enforcement and management, but also criminal law enforcement should be made public. It is necessary to prevent publicity that is good for us, secrecy or reservation that is bad for us, or only part of it. Only by extensive publicity can we plug the loopholes of corruption to the maximum extent, unveil the mystery of police work and give the people ample opportunities for supervision. At the same time, under the premise of legal provisions, public policing work should highlight the purpose of service, simplify procedures, and facilitate the masses, especially window units such as household registration, exit and entry management, vehicle management, public security management, etc., and formulate corresponding convenience measures to reflect the service of public policing.

(3) Strengthen the supervision over the openness of police affairs. In order to ensure the practicality and long-term effectiveness of police affairs publicity, we should insist on promoting publicity through supervision and promoting implementation through supervision. Internally, it is necessary to improve the police responsibility system, clarify the responsibilities of every policeman, every post and every policeman, and formulate a detailed assessment system. We should take the road of socialization of supervision, welcome the masses and all sectors of society to supervise the police work, accept and handle the opinions, suggestions, reports and complaints of the masses on the police work, and give timely feedback. It is necessary to adhere to and consolidate effective social supervision measures, and employ people from all walks of life who are knowledgeable, fair and enthusiastic about public welfare undertakings as police supervisors to ensure smooth work and smooth information. At the same time, through the implementation of law enforcement case reporting system, case return visit system and public interview system, the police's behavior is oriented to the masses, directly subject to the supervision of the masses, and ensure the openness of police affairs.

(4) Attach great importance to cooperation with news media. Today, with the increasingly developed mass media, news media have greatly influenced people's ideas and behaviors, and even dominated public opinion on public security organs to some extent. Public security organs should make full use of their own communication tools to publicize police-related information to the society in a planned, purposeful and step-by-step manner, so that public security media can become the main source of public security information for the people. At the same time, the public security organs should attach great importance to the role of the news media, strengthen exchanges and cooperation with the news media, so that the public security police work can be understood and supported by more media, so that the news media can pay attention to the achievements of public security work and the mainstream of the public security team, and do more positive publicity and praise for public security work and police activities, and less negative disclosure and criticism.

(5) Constantly innovate ways and means of making police affairs public. On the premise of realizing the expected effect of police propaganda and not violating national laws and ethics, the ways and means of police propaganda are boldly innovated and explored. You can publicize the specific contents of police affairs disclosure to the whole society through contact cards, convenience cards, bulletin boards, brochures, computer touch screens, government information publications, radio, newspapers and other forms, or regularly inform specific institutions and personnel such as the National People's Congress and the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference about public security work through meetings, notices and documents. You can accept the supervision and comments of NPC deputies, CPPCC members, invited supervisors, representatives of the masses, relevant social organizations and news media at any time, and you can also hold activities such as "Police Camp Open Day" and "Police Camp Cultural Exhibition" through community policing strategy, so that the masses can enter the police camp, publicize legal knowledge to the masses, display public security equipment, and realize benign interaction with the masses; We can publicize major police activities to the masses through television, inform them of work achievements, inspire them and win their understanding and participation. We can also make use of the characteristics of modern information technology such as the Internet, such as rapid release, wide range and convenient management and preservation, to carry out various police services in a timely and effective manner? Communicate information to the public. In a word, no matter how to innovate the ways and means of making police affairs public, we should avoid being stereotyped and unchanging, engaging in formalism, misleading and deceiving the masses with false information.