20 13 On August 2nd, Beijing Legal Evening News and Beijing News reported the Juxin case. Zhu Zijun, the legal representative of Beijing Juxin Lianying Technology and Trade Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Juxin Lianying") and other 13 executives were accused of selling goods under the guise of "joint joining scheme" for nearly two and a half years. Defendant's name, gender, age, native place, academic position and amount charged Zhu Zijun, male, 27 years old, legal representative and executive director of Beijing People's Vocational High School, more than 2.6 billion Xu Yuan Suning, male, 56 years old, chairman of Beijing People's College, more than 2.6 billion Xiao Yuan Zhang Dingnan, 42 years old, president of Zhejiang Xinchang People's Junior High School, Zhang Tao, 26 years old, male, 32 years old, Former Legal Representative General Manager of Langfang People's College 370 million Liu Yuan Jingchuan Male 28 years old Former Deputy General Manager of Beijing Undergraduate 370 million Yuan Ni Zhien Male 48 years old Executive General Manager of Sichuan Undergraduate190,000 Yuan Xing Anping Male 5 1 Year old Training Director of Beijing Senior High School 2.5 billion Yuan Yin Li Qiang Male 33 years old Customer Service Director of Beijing Renmin High School over 2.5 billion Yuan. Liu Yingnv is 52 years old. Chief Financial Officer of Beijing People's University11million yuan. Tang Nv 3 1 year. Marketing Director of Nanjing People's College, Jiangsu Province11100,000 yuan. Zhang Yanfang female, 27 years old. Audit manager of Peking University. More than 2.6 billion Yuan Guoqiang male, 28-year-old call center manager of Beijing People's College, more than 2.5 billion Yuan Li Chunhua female, 54-year-old director of Shijingshan service center of Peking People's University, more than 60 million yuan, 2012 In August 2003, Beijing Legal Evening News revealed that as early as the police investigation, some people claimed that they could dredge the relationship so that the company would not be investigated and be cheated100000. On May 9, 20 12, Zhu Zijun and others were arrested. A month before this, the police had begun to investigate Juxin Lianying Company. In the same month, Wang Yong, a friend of Xu Suning, the 56-year-old chairman of Juxin Lianyun Company, approached him and said that he could help dredge the senior leaders of the Ministry of Public Security, ensure that Juxin Lianyun Company would not be investigated before the 18th National Congress, and give the company enough time to transform and avoid. However, he proposed that he needed a benefit fee of 6.5438+million yuan. Zhu Zijun, Xiao et al. agreed to pay for this matter.
20 13 August13 Beijing Beijing News, Beijing Morning Post, Beijing Youth Daily and Beijing Jinghua Times disclosed that Wang Yong met with Zhu Zijun and others of Juxin Company to discuss100000 yuan. After trial, the Second Intermediate People's Court found that Wang Yong constituted the crime of fraud, and the amount was extremely huge. Should be sentenced to life imprisonment, deprivation of political rights for life, and confiscation of all personal property. Wang Yong appealed, but was rejected by the court of second instance. Most of the 6,543,800+million defrauded by Wang Yong has not been recovered.
judgement of first instance
The Second Intermediate People's Court found through trial that from June 5438+2, 2009 to May 5438+02, 2006, Zhu Zijun and Xu Suning, together with Liu Jingchuan and Xiao, gathered Ni Zhien, Xing Anping, Yin, Liu Ying, Tang Yonghua,,, and Li Chunhua, and publicized and promoted them through the Internet under the guise of selling goods. By preaching the past performance of Juxin Win-Win Company and simulating the growth ratio of turnover, the public can think that after joining Juxin Win-Win Company, they can get high returns by receiving operating subsidies, investment subsidies, consulting fees, elite awards, ranking awards, etc., and absorb public deposits of more than 2.6 billion yuan in disguise.
The Second Intermediate People's Court held that Zhu Zijun and others violated national laws and regulations, absorbed funds in the name of selling goods, absorbed public deposits in disguise, and undermined the financial management order. Its behavior has constituted the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits, and the amount of the crime is huge, which should be punished according to law. The above judgment was made according to the role of each defendant in the same crime and other sentencing circumstances.