At the beginning of the incident, a sports brand Sketcher pointed out that the sole design element of these two shoes launched by Hermes this year is eclair envol. It's similar to the massage that Skechers used before. In this announcement, we can see that she asked the court to compensate Hermes for the loss, the specific amount is subject to the judge's decision, and asked the court to prohibit Hermes' infringement. In the brand's speech, we can also hear a lot about this Hermes.
There is information about these two shoes. The price of SKECH brand shoes in official website go walk massage fit is about 849 to 899 yuan, while the price of this shoe ecair of Hermes is in? 6400。 Therefore, the gap is still relatively large, and although there is a big gap in the design of shoes, it can also be seen that the shoes are really similar, and this matter has been continuously promoted.
How should we treat the problem of infringement? In fact, many designers may have similar ideas, so this leads to why some products are made like themselves, especially some professional shoes. There are similarities, so this kind of problem is almost likely to appear if it is the thinking structure at the time of design, but the infringement is completely based on this, copying other people's things without changing the medicine. In this case, the first one is an infringement of the design right, and at the same time, the ticket takes away the achievements of others. Of course, we also have a relevant definition of this issue, so we also hope that this matter can be resolved decisively.