What is the process of judicial expertise in Suining, Zhong Yi?

1. What is the process of judicial expertise in Suining Zhong Yi? The process of judicial expertise in Suining Zhong Yi is as follows: 1. Entrust; 2. Acceptance; 3. Preliminary assessment; 4. Supplementary identification; 5. Re-appraisal; 6. Review and appraisal; Issue judicial authentication documents; 8. Appear in court. Judicial appraisal of disability refers to the appraisal of disability in general personal injury. Like other disability appraisal, this appraisal has its own appraisal process. Second, the specific process of judicial appraisal of disability (1) Entrust judicial appraisal institutions and social professional judicial appraisers to accept the entrustment of judicial organs and engage in judicial appraisal of entrusted matters; The entrustment of non-litigation case evaluation is subject to industry norms. 1. Judicial authentication institutions accept the entrustment of judicial organs and arbitration institutions. 2, in litigation cases, in the case of clear burden of proof, judicial authentication institutions can also accept the parties entrusted to conduct judicial authentication. When the parties entrust judicial expertise, it is generally carried out through a law firm. (2) After receiving the power of attorney, the accepting judicial authentication institution shall examine the matters entrusted by the client and make the following decision: 1. If it meets the acceptance conditions and can decide to accept it immediately, the judicial authentication institution shall sign a judicial authentication entrustment acceptance contract with the client; 2, can't immediately decide whether to accept it, it shall issue a "receipt" to the client, and make a decision on whether to accept it within 7 days from the date of receiving the entrusted materials; 3, does not meet the acceptance conditions, decided not to accept, should return the identification materials and explain the reasons to the client; 4. For the official letter, the judicial authentication institution shall make a written reply on whether or not to accept it within 7 days from the date of receiving the official letter. (3) After accepting the case for the first time, the appraisal institution shall assign personnel with social professional judicial expertise to undertake the appraisal work, and the same appraisal shall be conducted by two personnel with social professional judicial expertise. (IV) Supplementary Appraisal When accepting the entrustment for supplementary appraisal, the judicial appraisal institution shall examine the matters requested by the client. If it does not fall into the circumstances specified in Article 30 of the General Principles of Judicial Appraisal Procedure, the social professional judicial appraisal institution shall explain the situation to the client and return the power of attorney. The supplementary appraisal conforms to the provisions of Article 31 of the General Rules of Judicial Appraisal Procedure. The social professional judicial authentication institution may designate the original appraiser or other social professional judicial appraisers, and the supplementary appraisal document is an integral part of the original appraisal document. Under any of the following circumstances, the judicial authentication institution may accept the entrustment for supplementary authentication: (1) new relevant authentication materials are discovered; (2) There are omissions in the original appraisal items. (5) Re-authentication and re-authentication. A professional judicial authentication institution shall require the client to provide the same materials as the original authentication materials. Re-appraisal is still carried out in the original social professional judicial appraisal institution, and the original appraiser cannot undertake re-appraisal matters. Under any of the following circumstances, the judicial authentication institution may accept the entrustment to conduct re-authentication: (1) The judicial authentication institution or judicial appraiser conducts authentication beyond the scope or practice category of judicial authentication; (2) The submitted certification materials are false or inaccurate; (3) The standards, methods or equipment used in the original appraisal are improper, which leads to the unscientific and inaccurate conclusion of the original appraisal; (four) the original appraisal conclusion is inconsistent with other evidence; (5) The original judicial appraiser should have avoided but did not; (6) The original judicial appraiser issued a wrong appraisal conclusion due to fault; (six) if there is any objection to the appraisal conclusion, it may be entrusted by other judicial authentication institutions with higher qualifications for appraisal. In addition to the appraisal materials, the original judicial appraisal documents should also be submitted for review and appraisal. (seven) issued by the judicial authentication documents. After completing the work of social professional judicial authentication, the judicial appraiser shall issue a judicial authentication document. The production of social professional judicial authentication documents shall meet the conditions stipulated in Articles 39, 40, 41 and 42 of the General Principles of Judicial Authentication Procedure. The original of the judicial authentication document is in triplicate, one for the client, and the other two are filed by the judicial authentication institution. (eight) the judicial appraiser shall appear in court on time in accordance with the requirements of the judicial organ or the arbitration organ. When a judicial appraiser appears in court, he shall present his practice certificate, truthfully explain the basis of the appraisal conclusion according to law, and answer questions related to the appraisal. The process of judicial expertise is basically divided into eight steps, and the contents involved in each step are clearly stated in the text. While showing the formal process of judicial expertise to the public, the relevant state organs also promulgated the General Rules for Judicial Organs to Perform Judicial Expertise, that is, the Requirements for Personnel Operation Process of Judicial Expertise Center, which is the biggest breakthrough in recent years.