Recently, a news that Lenovo voted for Qualcomm instead of Huawei in the 5G standard voting went viral on the Internet. Lenovo was also besieged by a large number of netizens who didn't know the truth and was criticized as "unpatriotic".
In this regard, Liu Chuanzhi, founder of Lenovo Group and chairman of Legend Holdings, also sent an internal letter with Yang, president of Legend Holdings and chairman and CEO of Lenovo Group, explaining the actual situation and survey results of "5G voting" to all Lenovo employees. Lenovo Group chose LDPC technology scheme based on its existing technology and patent reserve.
This meeting only decided the long code scheme of the data channel, but not the short code scheme of the data channel. In the long code voting, all participating brands including Huawei Lenovo agreed to adopt Qualcomm LDPC as the long code scheme. Therefore, the voting at this meeting did not have a decisive impact on Huawei Polar.
In the voting of data channel short code, more than 40 enterprises, such as Lenovo, supported Huawei Polar, with more votes than Qualcomm LDPC. However, due to the different weights of votes held by different enterprises, Qualcomm LDPC still obtained the short code of data channel. In the control channel voting, more than 60 companies, including Lenovo, voted for Huawei Polar to help Huawei Polar successfully win the control channel code.
From this point of view, Lenovo's support for Huawei Polar is obvious. It is not true that a large number of netizens concentrated on attacking "Huawei Polar lost its short code because of Lenovo's opposition".
People's Daily Online-Restoring Lenovo's 5G Voting Truth Huawei officially thanked Lenovo for its support.