Are the cultural relics in the Forbidden City copyrighted? how much is it? -Copyright of Chinese paintings before the Qing Dynasty

Why do you charge copyright fees for things in the Forbidden City? "

imperial capital

"It is not only a palace, but also a national cultural symbol and a gold-lettered signboard. Is copyrighted.

imperial capital

A thousand miles across the country

"Wenchuang Works" and "XX's Wenchuang Works are based on thousands of miles of rivers and mountains, and the original works are hidden in the Forbidden City". The former may infringe, while the latter does not. As a "signboard", the word "Forbidden City" belongs to the state in many cases when it comes to commerce (the cultural and creative team of the Forbidden City).

Copyright fees generally refer to royalties. Royalty, also known as royalty, is the monetary benefit that the creator or copyright owner of intellectual property rights collects from others who use their intellectual property rights. Use copyright, franchise,

copyright

People who own intellectual property rights such as trademarks and patents may have to pay royalties.

Are there any copyright restrictions on historical sites or cultural relics? There is no copyright restriction, but it is best not to use it for commercial purposes, especially the Forbidden City, which is quite special.

Ordinary should be fine. After all, there was no such thing as copyright at that time.

You use materials as models, so you shouldn't apply for a patent, right? You can only enjoy the copyright of this mode, and the copyright will be automatically generated when the work is completed.

Works of art that can be reproduced, painted, photographed, recorded and displayed in outdoor public places.

On the Copyright of Chinese Paintings before Qing Dynasty: Chinese Paintings in Song Dynasty had no copyright. Even if you use other people's photos, I personally think it doesn't matter, because all photos are not photos taken, which is equivalent to a description of the content. Even if there are so-called copyright problems in photographic works, it is generally impossible to prove the existence of copyright. After all, all photos reflect objective facts, and everyone takes them this way. It is impossible to prove that someone took them.