In the field of power electronics simulation, compared with Pspice, what can't be achieved from a technical point of view?

The main factor that determines the simulation accuracy is the accuracy of the model itself, followed by the simulator algorithm and the simulation accuracy setting. The model accuracy is not directly related to the software. However, comparing the MAST and PSpice models of SABER, SABER can provide more parameters related to accuracy than PSPICE for commonly used templates (such as RLC, transformers, etc.). ), so there is a lot of room for improvement in accuracy. As for the simulation algorithm, SABER adopts a patented algorithm, which can greatly improve the simulation convergence of the closed-loop system and naturally achieve higher accuracy. In the simulation of complex closed-loop oscillation circuits, such as switching power supply circuits, SABER's ability is second to none, from the waveform change trend of each point in the circuit to the ripple parameters on the waveform, it is very close to the true value. Of course, SABER's own mast model is used, and PSPICE's performance in this respect is probably a bit stretched. From the simulator setting, SABER's simulator setting is far more comprehensive and excellent than PSPICE's, ranging from the setting of truncation error, time step, result saving and output to the flexible means suitable for large-scale simulation tasks such as subsection simulation and conditional simulation. Any simulation software for analog hybrid circuits is hard to compare with SABER.