1, the substitution performance law of counterfeit and shoddy products. When signing the sales contract, the fraudsters presented the real samples with high quality, but when fulfilling them, they replaced them with fake and defective products with poor quality. 2. Failure or incomplete performance of fraud law. 3, the method of forging product quality appraisal certificate or mark. The supplier has no products or unqualified products, but in order to defraud the other party to sign the contract, he forged the quality appraisal certificate or mark of the products, and concluded the contract after the other party saw it and believed it to be true. After the other party performed, the supplier stopped performing and ran away in return. 4. The Law of Temptation Contract for Counterfeit Registered Trademarks. In order to induce the other party to sign a contract and defraud money, one party passes off its fake and shoddy products as registered trademark goods, and the other party signs a contract with registered trademark goods out of trust, only to find out that it has been cheated after fulfilling the contract. 5. The method of lying about patented products. One party (supplier) falsely claims that its product is a patented product or a famous product, and takes advantage of the other party's poor information, traffic congestion and lack of experience to have a wrong understanding of the mystery or trust of the "patented" or "famous" product. A supplier signs a contract with the other party under the condition that the other party's intention is not true, so as to promote his own fake and inferior products.
Legal basis:
Criminal law of the people's Republic of China
Article 266 Whoever defrauds public or private property in a relatively large amount shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance, and shall also or solely be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than 10 years, and shall also be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment, and shall also be fined or confiscated. Where there are other provisions in this Law, such provisions shall prevail.
Article 192 Whoever illegally raises funds by fraudulent means for the purpose of illegal possession shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years; if the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than seven years or life imprisonment and shall also be fined or confiscated.
If a unit commits the crime mentioned in the preceding paragraph, it shall be fined, and the directly responsible person in charge and other directly responsible personnel shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
Derivative problem:
What is the qualitative standard of fraud?
(a) the object elements, the object of this crime is the ownership of public and private property. The object of the crime of fraud is limited to the property of the state, the collective or the individual, and no other illegal interests may be defrauded. Some criminal activities, although they also use some deception and even pursue some illegal economic interests, are not or are not limited to the ownership of public and private property. So it does not constitute fraud. For example, abducting and selling women and children is a crime of violating personal rights. (2) objective elements, this crime is objectively manifested in the use of fraud to defraud a large amount of public and private property. 1. First of all, the perpetrator committed fraud. Formally speaking, fraud includes two kinds, one is to fabricate facts, the other is to conceal the truth, both of which are essentially behaviors that make victims fall into wrong understanding. The content of fraud is to make the victim have a wrong understanding and make the property disposal that the perpetrator wants under certain circumstances. Therefore, fabricating or concealing past facts, or present facts and future facts, as long as they have the above contents, is a kind of fraud. If the fraudulent content does not make them dispose of their property, it is not fraudulent fraud. Secondly, fraud makes the other party have a wrong understanding. The misunderstanding of the other party is caused by the fraud of the perpetrator. Even if the other party has some misjudgments, it does not hinder the establishment of fraud. Between fraud and the other party's disposition of property, it is bound to involve the other party's misunderstanding. If the other party disposes of the property due to fraud and does not cause misunderstanding, it is not a crime of fraud. Thirdly, the crime of fraud requires the victim to impose property punishment after falling into a wrong understanding. Disposing of property is manifested as direct delivery of property, or commitment of the actor to obtain property, or commitment to transfer property interests. If the perpetrator commits fraud and makes others give up their property, and the perpetrator picks up the property, he should also be punished as fraud. However, the act of putting a piece of metal similar to a coin into a vending machine to obtain goods in the vending machine does not constitute fraud, but only theft. Finally, after the victim disposed of the property by fraudulent means, the actor obtained the property, thus damaging the victim's property.