Why does Xiaomi mobile phone have hardware anti-shake, but it does not support 6-frame anti-shake?

The hardware image stabilization, that is, the optical image stabilization, works at 6 frames, but the electronic image stabilization doesn't work.

as for why electronic image stabilization doesn't work at 6 frames, it may be a problem of computing power. Because electronic anti-shake relies on cutting the picture to buffer the jitter, it requires a lot of calculation by the processor, and the amount of calculation data of 6 frames is too large. Maybe in order to ensure stability, electronic anti-shake is only turned on at 3 frames.

theoretically, as long as the technology is in place, at present, apart from Huawei and Apple, most manufacturers' photo optimization sources are from two places: one is a foreign Google camera, and the other is a company specializing in optimization in China. Note that this is the only one in China (because I can't remember the name clearly, let's call it factory S for the time being), and it provides all-round services to all manufacturers. I think there are several main aspects.

1. The optimization of Google and S Factory is divided into two versions, one is the ordinary version, and the other is the VVIP version. The ordinary version is generally expensive, and the source code can be given. The VVIP version may be several times more expensive. The VVIP version supports the above technologies, so it can be regarded as a technical reserve.

Second, each mobile phone manufacturer has its own camera team. Although it won't have its own algorithm scientists like Huawei or Apple, it is still technical to do some ordinary optimization.

Third, Xiaomi mobile phone manufacturers believe that as long as their own team specializes in research, they can understand those free camera codes, which can increase the cost of mobile phones at a lower price.

Fourth, Xiaomi mobile phone manufacturer or other mobile phone manufacturers have bought the 6-frame anti-shake technology from Google or S factory, so that the price of this technology may be cheaper when it leaves the factory again, and of course it can be immature.

5. Although it can be seen that Xiaomi is a complete assembly plant, although there is no technology, it is necessary to pretend that there is technology. When OV comes out with this technology, Xiaomi will say that we have already studied it.

So, in any case, Xiaomi is the sixth mobile phone manufacturer in China. Compared with Meizu, Gionee and Lenovo, Xiaomi is much better than them.

For example, Meizu 15' s main camera also uses optical image stabilization, but no matter 18 or 4k, optical image stabilization cannot be activated. However, when you use video shooting software such as WeChat video and Tik Tok on your mobile phone, you can activate the optical anti-shake module in this machine.

So some mobile phones are equipped with optical anti-shake, but there are several possibilities that they can't be used in some cases:

First, because of the differentiated positioning of mobile phones. It needs to be done in some functions, and the trade-off is just like the red rice mobile phone was artificially castrated in the manual mode of the camera 17 years ago, which is more likely. < P > As for the second cost problem, a new algorithm is needed to activate the optical anti-shake component and electronically enhance the anti-shake in the video, but this algorithm requires a patent fee to the algorithm provider. Therefore, although some mobile phones are equipped with optical image stabilization, they still can't be used when shooting videos.

third, the optimization problem may be that the video anti-shake component has not been developed yet when the mobile phone is released, so it is possible to carry this function through the later ota upgrade.

I hope my answer can help you.

it is absolutely possible to support it, but MIUI has not done so. There may be several reasons!

1. Trend problem. It seems that only Apple supports 6-frame anti-shake at present! Android phones seem to work hard in 3 frames! With the current Android phone hardware! Supporting 6-frame shooting has already been satisfied, just add anti-shake, it should not be difficult! So everyone does it, so Xiaomi does it normally! You don't have to be 6 frames more anti-shake than Apple.

2, the problem of positioning! In the field of high-end Android phones, users don't seem to care much about how many frames this video is, but only care about turning on the phone to shoot, whether it supports anti-shake and how effective it is! Just like the current Android machine, it is better than Apple in the anti-shake effect of the default 3 frames! Huawei, Xiaomi and OPPO are all excellent! I don't feel the need to do 6 frames of anti-shake! I feel that this pattern is the same!

3, the investment problem, because this is a topic that very few people talk about, simply meet the requirements of most people first, and reduce investment on development issues! After all, it takes a lot of technical means to get to 6 frames! We have to solve all kinds of bugs later! Maybe it will bring some negative effects!

4. Brand positioning. Since Apple has used this function, it is only a matter of time before Android phones will be used slowly! Then this high-positioning function will definitely appear in high-end products. Android is not available now, and there will definitely be some in the future. As far as Xiaomi is concerned, the digital series is useless, and there is the mix series, which has never been seen! I guess it's waiting for consideration, and then I'll use it when I choose.

in a word, I think the hardware can definitely be supported! System optimization and camera module optimization can also be done! The decision is still in the hands of the manufacturer, and of course it may have something to do with the Android system itself! I don't know this for a while! See how the follow-up products are elaborated!

actually, it's very simple, just because of the lack of optimization and coordination of the mobile phone itself.

like some high-end manufacturers. Where are some camera optimization teams? They are already top-notch, so they will naturally make a series of optimizations. Or Xiaomi is still being optimized.

the first millet didn't start with a camera, but it was cost-effective and started with marketing. Then it is not so good at technical words, and then it has not heard of some Xiaomi buying some, high-end cameras and an algorithm, a studio or a company! Then he has his own shortcomings in these technologies. CPU, camera, high frame rate and a function of anti-shake optimization, which is greatly optimized at the bottom level. If you want this function, look at the later update and adjustment!

the physics of the second itself is not supported, but what I said is that the camera has a high frame rate and can't be turned on at the same time. If physics can't be used, it can't be used!

The frequency of human visual perception of external images is 24 frames per second, which is a complete and continuous image. Below this frequency, the naked eye will feel stuck, and above this frequency, the sense of flesh is not strong. Therefore, the TV picture adopts a frame rate of 24 per second. The original movies used a frame rate of 25 frames per second.

It should be because the time is divided into 6 degrees (one hour = 6 minutes, and one minute equals 6 seconds). In order to realize the controllability of modifying and playing frame by frame, the subsequent video frame rate is set according to the magnification of 6.

only as a brain impression and judgment, not as a professional answer!

The software can be optimized, and the firmware upgrade can be solved. The Xiaomi team will continue to support it. This demand reaches Xiaomi team in time to achieve faster

Xiaomi, to be honest, it feels like a penny is worth a penny. Their quality control and accessories selection have never been very strong. If the place you can see is tall, what you don't understand will shrink. Cost-effectiveness is a false proposition

How do you say this? It turns out that our family all use Nokia. After five years, it was changed to Xiaomi, and it was also used well. After one or two years, it was very stuck. Last year, I used a cc9 with 1 million pixels, and this problem also existed. The anti-shake effect is not very good ... Maybe it's because of the cost. It should be understood that a penny is worth a penny. It is suggested that Xiaomi should be either high-grade or hardware set up.