As laws, intellectual property law and civil and commercial law have some similarities or similarities.
(1) Both laws take property interests and personal interests as levers and adjust social relations by means of rights and obligations; In specific legal norms, it is centered on the confirmation and protection of rights.
(2) In the intellectual property law, when the obligee permits others to use or transfer his rights, the relationship between rights and obligations with others will become a general civil legal relationship, which will be handled according to the principle of debt and contract. This phenomenon can be regarded as the intersection of intellectual property law and civil and commercial law.
2, the difference between the two laws:
( 1)? The two kinds of legislation have different value orientations. (2) The structures of the two kinds of legislation are different.
(3) The attributes of the two laws are different.
(4) The contents of the two laws are quite different.
Extended data:
Compared with the rights in intellectual property law, the rights in civil law are single in form, that is, every right exists independently of each other and belongs to the same level; They don't affect each other, they don't restrict each other, and they all play their respective roles independently.
However, the rights in intellectual property rights are very different. The rights here are arranged in layers, and there is a causal relationship between layers. The former right can influence and restrict the latter right, and the whole right system presents a network structure. In short, the difference between intellectual property law and civil law is very obvious. The similarity between them is only a limited intersection of the two laws, and differences and differences account for the main part. Therefore, we cannot simply combine the two laws.