At least 73 of the 535 members of the U.S. House of Representatives are directly or indirectly shareholders of Cisco. In the past few years, Huawei has not only had intellectual property disputes with Cisco, but many of Huawei's investment and M&A transactions in the United States have also been investigated and blocked by the U.S. Foreign Investment Review Board. Compared with competitors such as Cisco, which have strong lobbying power, Huawei has too few friends in Washington. "
" Fang Xingdong said that the United States' decision to ban Huawei is a battle of interests. This incident is a continuation of Cisco's lawsuit against Huawei 10 years ago. 10 years ago, Cisco launched the first war over intellectual property issues. , On the contrary, it helped Huawei's openness and internationalization. Cisco did not use the openness of its products to compete fairly, but used political means to achieve its goals. They used the government to block Huawei's acquisition.
Huawei's 10-year growth data has maintained a high degree of growth from US$9.2 billion in 2007 to US$32.3 billion now. Cisco's revenue has been maintained in the past few years. It fell sharply in 2009 and now maintains a weak growth.
Fang Xingdong asked why Cisco is so afraid of Huawei because Cisco wants to maintain high profits. Cisco's revenue in the US market accounts for 60%, Huawei's revenue in the Chinese market is only 30%, and its revenue abroad is 70%. After the war 10 years ago, Huawei has become more global. If its monopoly in the United States is destroyed, it will be a fatal blow to Cisco. So this time Huawei was "banned" by Cisco through political means. ”
Cisco CEO John Chambers once said: “I knew 25 years ago that our strongest competitor would come from China. Now, that is Huawei.” . "
" Sino-US relations will be more tense than relaxed in the future, and it is inevitable for companies to become political victims. However, they can use this to become familiar with the rules of the Western game, be good at learning, and deal with it indifferently instead of being resentful and panicked. ”
from: /index/guest.html
Motorola sued Huawei in the United States for stealing trade secrets
Motorola filed the lawsuit in the Northern District Court of Illinois The lawsuit accuses Huawei Technologies Co., China's largest telecommunications equipment manufacturer, of stealing its trade secrets.
Motorola stated in the indictment that a number of former Motorola employees, most of whom were of Chinese descent, provided information about their products to Huawei. The latest wireless technology, including details of the company's "seamless mobility" technology project developed in the early 1990s.
This is also the first time Motorola, based in Merchant, Illinois, has sued Huawei. It has sued Lemko, a technology company that employs many former Motorola employees and a group of former employees.
Motorola pointed out in the latest lawsuit that it is said that former employee Pan Shaowei is now directly the founder and director of Huawei. Pan Shaowei worked under the leadership of Ren Zhengfei for about 10 years until his resignation in April 2004, and then served as the chief technology officer of Lemko.
The indictment stated that Mr. Pan held the position he obtained from Motorola. He relied in part on former colleagues at Motorola who helped found Lemko with the idea of ??trade secrets. However, Lemko's vice president of marketing was also named as a defendant. Faye Vorick said: "All the accusations are ridiculous and false, and many of the people named in the indictment had left Motorola for many years before joining Lemko. It is our policy to have no further comment regarding litigation. ”
As a senior marketing manager, Ms. Warwick was accused of “being the first person to commit Lemko’s wrongdoing and her role was very critical.” But she denied these accusations and said: "This is ridiculous. I had left Motorola for many years before I came to Lemko and I adhered to and respected all confidentiality agreements." "
Huawei stated in a statement to NetEase Technology that Motorola's accusations were baseless and had no legal basis. "Huawei has no relationship with Lemko, let alone a so-called resale agreement. Huawei will vigorously defend itself against baseless accusations. "
Motorola China later issued a statement saying, "Motorola does not comment on the pending litigation, but will actively protect its intellectual property rights.
"Motorola demanded in the lawsuit that Huawei return its trade secrets and compensate for its losses.
This is not the first time that Huawei has been accused by a US company of stealing trade secrets. In 2003, Cisco Systems claimed that the company had stolen its trade secrets. Router code. Cisco eventually dropped the lawsuit after Huawei agreed to modify its router products and withdraw the products it had sold. In 2004, a Huawei employee was caught taking photos of a competitor's product at a Chicago trade show. /p>