First, the exclusivity of a considerable number of intellectual property rights is related to the statutory limitation, and the exclusivity of property rights is generally not limited by the statutory time. Property rights and most other property rights have no statutory time limit, and only a few other property rights such as land use rights and land contractual management rights have statutory time limits.
Second, except for some other property rights, such as security property rights, the loss of collateral does not necessarily lead to the loss of rights, and the exclusiveness of property rights will be lost with the loss of "things" as the object of property rights. Generally speaking, unless there is only a unique correspondence between the object of intellectual property and its carrier, for example, a novel created by a writer has only one manuscript, and the content and expression of the novel cannot be reproduced by memory, then knowledge.
Third, the exclusivity of property rights is limited to specific things, while the exclusivity of intellectual property rights has nothing to do with specific things. For example, if someone buys a musical instrument, he certainly enjoys exclusive rights to it, but he cannot exclude others from owning the same musical instrument. Now, assuming that the instrument is a patented product of China's invention patent, the patentee has the right to prohibit others from manufacturing, using, selling, promising to sell or importing the same product as its patented product for the purpose of production and operation.