What does the "association event" remind you of?

No corporate legal person can do without in-depth study and education of Mao Zedong Thought, otherwise intellectuals will easily go against the country and the people. As for those grassroots entrepreneurs, there is even more need to sound the alarm once they leave. Without the supervision of the state and the people, it is easy to lead to ideological degeneration, poisoning people's souls, and corrupting the thoughts of a generation. At the same time, Chairman Mao once said: The masses of the people are the real force that promotes human civilization and social progress.

The loss of state-owned assets of all sizes

When I think of the Lenovo computer I bought, I feel pain forever in my heart.

The Lenovo incident reminds people of the reform of state-owned enterprises. We must actually strengthen supervision to prevent worms with evil intentions from emptying state-owned assets and transferring them into their own pockets under the pretext of reform. The real Let patriotic scientific and technological talents like Academician Ni Guangnan with a sense of family and country manage enterprises, enable state-owned enterprises to follow a technology, industry and trade route based on technology research and development, and strengthen patent protection. (Why not like the Hanka invented by Academician Ni Guangnan? How about applying for patents? , the lesson is profound, this is the painful lesson of Godfather Liu and Yang Yuanqing’s trade, industry and technology route.

The association of events makes people think twice about the association. If Lenovo becomes China's economic model and is guided by Lenovo's development philosophy as a national high-tech product, it will definitely lead the country's national industry to disaster and even destruction.

If we don’t wake up and stop it now, it will definitely endanger the socialist national system and completely fall back to the capital market marketing model. This enriches individuals and harms the interests of the people. If the country recognizes its development model, China's road to rejuvenation will be interrupted. The road of Lenovo is the road of decline. We should learn from the past and do not lead to the overthrow of others! !

Regarding the status of scientific researchers, their main business is academic research and practice. They are particularly easy to be deceived in terms of economic and interpersonal communication. They are often sold to pay for others. Without a sound mechanism, they cannot work with peace of mind. They always want to go abroad and live abroad because they are worried about this situation.

Let everyone think of the heartache of 76 years! Reminds me of what I was thinking about in the future! Lenovo’s asset magic show for nearly forty years! It reminds me that a billion-dollar annual salary for state-owned enterprise bosses is not a dream.

Enterprises, like operators, will have shortcomings and areas for improvement, which are problems of the enterprise’s own operations. As long as the company abides by laws and pays taxes for the country... only the relevant parties of the company, shareholders, employees, creditors and interests, etc., have the right to comment. Sima Nanzhan The state is highly critical of Lenovo, but Sima does not represent the people. How private enterprises operate cannot be slandered at will by Sima Nan and others. He is showing his "unique insight" and testing his ability to incite and fool the people... in order to harvest traffic, and his purpose is obvious.

I think of hammers. A company called high-tech may not necessarily be a technology company. A company called a company called the Academy of Sciences may not necessarily cultivate a technology company. A company called a national enterprise may not necessarily have a national heart. A company called a state-owned enterprise may not be a technology company. He has done what he is supposed to do, but his appearance is useless

In the past few days, Mr. Sima Nan "n asked" Lenovo to question its sale of state-owned assets at a low price and the loss of state-owned assets, which set off a wave of controversy on the Internet platform. Another heat wave. Lenovo ignored this and remained silent. This puts Sima Nan in embarrassment and makes the claw eaters dissatisfied.

Since Mr. Sima Nan knew or had evidence that Lenovo was selling off state-owned assets at a low price, causing the loss of state-owned assets, and he had a passion for justice and justice, why didn't he report it directly to the relevant departments? Instead, they spend their time on online platforms again and again. Is the evidence not strong enough? Or are you cutting leeks for traffic? Still don’t trust the “relevant departments”? Maybe there are others...? It's puzzling.