Patent application answering questions

Judging from what you said in the Notice of Review Opinions that "this scheme can be thought of by people in the industry", you should reply to the creativity of this application.

Preliminary analysis shows that of the three opinions you listed, the first one is definitely unacceptable. Because in your first reply, you aimed at the novelty of the patent application, not creativity.

The answer to creativity should state two aspects:

1, highlighting substantive features.

2. Significant progress.

Your third reason can answer "remarkable progress" in creative judgment, but what is lacking is "outstanding substantive characteristics"

The above is only a preliminary judgment. If you want to make a specific judgment, you need to check the patent application documents and the notice of examination opinions. .