Netease issued a right statement on PUBG's lawsuit against Operation Wilderness. what do you think?

The game is updated very quickly, and good games are easy to imitate. Such a thing happened in the game circle recently. PUBG filed a lawsuit against Netease's Wild Action in California, claiming that Netease's Wild Action was infringing, and listed more than 20 places where Netease was involved in infringement. Netease was also asked to remove Operation Wilderness. After this incident, Netease issued a statement on rights protection.

For this reason, many netizens have different opinions on Netease's rights protection statement, and some think that Netease's rights protection behavior is a bluff; Some people think that infringement is too arbitrary, and Netease's rights protection is necessary. Personally, I am neutral. We have no right to guess and comment until the matter is completely solved. Waiting for the result is more correct.

Although PUBG filed a lawsuit against Netease's Wild Action, last year, Wild Action entered the public's field of vision, and many players have experienced it. Although there are many similarities between Operation Wilderness and Survival of the Jedi, there are still differences in equipment and between them. In addition, "Wild Action" as a mobile game entered the player's field of vision and also made many players experience it.

Of course, it is undeniable that this game is indeed inspired by Survival of the Jedi, but as for whether Netease infringes, I think we as netizens and players can't comment and guess at will. These things still need to go through some processes to make it clear. But in any case, I will definitely give you an answer in the end. Until then, I think we'd better be rational.