What about Thorpe Cable's lawsuit against Shanghai Slide Cable for infringing technology patent? Will it affect the domestic cable industry environment?

2015165438+1October 27th, the judgment came down. Thorpe Cable v. Shanghai Slide Cable, and the related charges are not established.

Before, the cable engineers of cable companies switched to sliding platform cables, and the quality of sliding platform cables suddenly rose, causing doubts from all walks of life. Cable TV spectrum companies are naturally direct stakeholders. After inspection, it is found that there is almost no difference between the high-end line quality and the cable spectrum of the sliding table cable, and some performances even exceed that of the cable. There seems to be a direct connection between the two events.

However, after patent examination and process comparison, it was found that the slipway cable adopted a new process, but the patent consciousness was not strong enough, and the patent was not declared and kept secret, which made all parties including cable spectrum company think that the slipway cable copied the relevant process, and its process method was not disclosed until it was sued.

Coincidentally, earlier, engineers from Igos, brevetti and other companies switched to slide cable, which also narrowed the quality gap. The technological improvement of sliding platform cable should be a new method jointly developed by all parties.

Because domestic companies have been engaged in "cottage" and reverse engineering, inertia thinking has formed in many people's minds. Bottom line: domestic products should be self-reliant.

There are quite a lot of such news on industry forums and portals, so pay more attention to it.