What is the design patent search report?

The newly revised patent law stipulates that the evaluation report can be used as preliminary evidence to judge the validity of the patent right when claiming the right. I think this is necessary. Because the design patent was granted without substantive examination, the stability of the right should be considered when claiming the right, and the evaluation report is only the preliminary evidence to prove the stability of the right. But what I am worried about is that some problems have appeared in the utility model retrieval report, and I hope they will not appear in the design retrieval report again. Patent inquiry is a matter of time. You can't go months without writing a report. There should be a time limit, and it should be short, such as two months. Third, the law stipulates that the evaluation report is a very important document. However, if the people's court only takes the evaluation report as a reference, it may be that the claimant or defendant can cite something other than your evaluation report when using the existing design as a defense. This evaluation report should also be revised in the retrieval department to accept other people's evidence.