If you had to choose between Rolex and Universal, which one would you choose?

Rolex, Omega and Wan Guo, which is more worth choosing?

Recently, a friend who wants to buy a watch asked the author such a question. His budget is about 80,000 RMB, which do you think is better?

I recommend Rolex first, because this price can just buy some classic watches of Rolex, such as Water Ghost and GMT.

For example, this Rolex submariner series11610LN-97200 black-disk watch is equipped with Rolex classic automatic mechanical movement Cal.3 135, which is common in all kinds of big three-hand watches with date function. The case and bracelet are made of 904L stainless steel patented by Rolex, which has the functions of date display. Table. But because this watch is too hot, there is generally no regular price.

And this Rolex Greenwich II series126710brlo-0001watch is equipped with automatic mechanical movement Cal.3285, bidirectional rotating outer ring and red and blue ceramic 24-hour dial ring. Both the case and bracelet are made of stainless steel, with date display and dual time zone function. The watch is 40mm in diameter and waterproof.

In terms of grade, these three brands are almost the same, basically the so-called classic luxury brands, but in contrast, Rolex is slightly higher, followed by all countries.

If the budget is reduced to 30,000-50,000, priority can be given to Omega and IWC.

For example, this Omega Haima Series 231.10.42.210.02.004 watch is equipped with Omega's self-made high antimagnetic automatic mechanical movement. The case and bracelet are made of stainless steel, with date display and antimagnetic function, with a diameter of 4 1.5mm and water resistance of 65438+.

There is also this IWC IW37 14 16 watch, which is equipped with automatic mechanical movement Cal.79350, basic movement ETA-7750, 3 1 gem, with 44-hour power reserve, fine steel case, rhodium-plated steel dial and blue crocodile leather strap, and has the functions of timing. , with a diameter of 40.

The above suggestions are for reference only.