Absolutely not!
The principle of many technical schemes is the same, but the means of implementation are different.
Anyway, what is the patent claim of Company B, its structure or method? If it is a structure, how is the structure defined? If it is a method, what are the process steps?
If it is a structural patent, you should analyze whether some structures (including elements, structures, connections and coordination) can be omitted from the structural features defined in the claim. ), if there is, it will be omitted; If not, see if structural changes can be made, and if so, change them.
If it is a method step, it is also circumvented according to the above process.
In addition, I would like to remind you that any changes made by Company A should be accompanied by the idea of deploying patents by itself.
On the other hand, if the patent of Company B is really all-encompassing and inevitable, there are two ways to solve it. The first way is to talk about authorization, and the second way is invalid or retrial (USA). The first one is recommended unless it is obviously ineffective.