I don't have your work experience, so I can't sum it up, but please refer to the following information:
Summary is to think rationally about the work that has been done well. What it wants to review is what it did in the past, how it was done and how it was done. Summary and planning complement each other and should be based on planning, which is always based on summing up experience. There is a rule in this, that is, plan-practice-summary-re-plan-practice-summary.
Summary has the following characteristics:
1, work summary requires people to calmly reflect on their past work. Through reflection, we can improve our understanding, gain experience and lay an ideological foundation for further work.
2. Emphasize science. Summing up experience can't be practical, but "follow your feelings". Instead, we should discuss things realistically, make dialectical analysis, and strive to draw scientific conclusions, thus promoting the change of work.
3. Comment on the combination of narration and discussion in expression. In addition to narration and explanation, work summary should also be discussed. Through the introduction and analysis of typical materials, the author's point of view is clarified, so as to sort out and theorize the experience and lessons and avoid the bias between empty materials and piled materials.
(Intellectual property here mainly refers to trademarks, patents, copyrights, etc. )
I hope my answer can solve your problem and help you. Have a happy day!