In the process of patent application examination, there are many cases in which the examination period is extended due to non-trial reasons. For example, before the priority examination is passed, the applicant can propose amendments to the application documents according to the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 51 of the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Patent Law of China, so as to meet the needs of the applicant to amend the application documents, and after the priority examination is passed, the above amendments will lead to the extension of the examination period; If the applicant's reply period exceeds the time limit stipulated in Article 11 of the new measures, the review period shall be extended; Applicants who submit false materials or abnormal applications violate the principle of good faith and should not be given priority review. Therefore, for the priority review of patent applications, Article 12 of the new Measures stipulates that in any of the following circumstances, China National Intellectual Property Administration may stop the priority review procedure and handle it in accordance with ordinary procedures:
1. After the priority review request is approved, the applicant proposes to modify the application documents according to the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 51 of the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Patent Law;
2. The time limit for the applicant to reply exceeds the time limit stipulated in Article 11 of these Measures;
3. The applicant submits false materials;
4. It was found to be an abnormal patent application during the examination.