Practical patent, the problem of two independent rights

first, most of the multi-theme claims are parts first and then integrated, and the opposite way is rarely adopted.

secondly, the claim of the fan includes the motor as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, so there is no need to repeat the description.

thirdly, in the following description, there should only be more or less, that is to say, at least there should be copied parts, and more details are better.

fourthly, the abstract is relatively simple: the utility model relates to the field of xx, in particular to a motor and a fan containing the motor, which can … (advantages of the product), wherein the motor includes … (just stick the sole right of the motor).